Literature DB >> 10571632

Testicular prostheses: body image and sexual functioning.

L Incrocci1, J L Bosch, A K Slob.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate retrospectively the body image and sexual functioning in patients who have a testicular prosthesis (TP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical charts were evaluated for 30 adult patients who received 32 TPs between 1985 and 1997. A questionnaire was mailed to each patient, asking about body image, satisfaction with the implant and with sexual functioning.
RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 22 (73%) replied; their mean (range) age was 30 (18-47) years. Most of the patients had a silicone gel-filled TP. No complications were reported in 25 (83%) patients and 80% reported no sexual problems; 20% felt uncomfortable in intimate contacts, 68% found their body image improved after having a TP, 58% were satisfied with their current sexual life, 90% had no erectile dysfunction and 45% reported premature ejaculation.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have lost a testis for any reason should be informed about the availability of a TP. Prostheses were well accepted and no systemic disease was reported. Almost all patients reported an improvement in their body image. Sexual life and performance were apparently not compromised by having a TP. New surgical procedures are recommended to improve the cosmetic appearance of a TP in the scrotum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571632     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00347.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

1.  Simple placement of prosthetic testes in children.

Authors:  Brice Antao; Ewen Mackinnon
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Testicular prostheses: development and modern usage.

Authors:  D Bodiwala; D J Summerton; T R Terry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  A Review of Transplantation Practice of the Urologic Organs: Is It Only Achievable for the Kidney?

Authors:  Jack Donati-Bourne; Harry W Roberts; Yaseen Rajjoub; Robert A Coleman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

4.  Sexual functioning among testicular cancer survivors: a case-control study in the U.S.

Authors:  Christopher Kim; Katherine A McGlynn; Ruth McCorkle; Yonghong Li; Ralph L Erickson; Shuangge Ma; David W Niebuhr; Guangsheng Zhang; Yaqun Zhang; Yana Bai; Li Dai; Barry I Graubard; Tongzhang Zheng; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Kathryn H Barry; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Tissue engineered testicular prostheses with prolonged testosterone release.

Authors:  Atlantida M Raya-Rivera; Carlos Baez; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Complete Expulsion of Testicular Prosthesis via the Scrotum: A Case-Based Review of the Preventive Surgical Strategies.

Authors:  Jack Donati-Bourne; A Deb; Suresh Jay Mathias; Mark Fraser Saxby; Herman Fernando
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2015-06-02

7.  Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Dieckmann; Petra Anheuser; Stefan Schmidt; Benjamin Soyka-Hundt; Uwe Pichlmeier; Philipp Schriefer; Cord Matthies; Michael Hartmann; Christian G Ruf
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion.

Authors:  Aza Mohammed; Musaab Yassin; David Hendry; Gregory Walker
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-10-13

9.  Management of Testicular Silicone Gel-Filled Prosthesis Rupture: Case Report of a Rare Event and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Quang-Bao Phan; Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 10.  Sexual function and male cancer.

Authors:  Luca Incrocci
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.