Literature DB >> 10570438

Papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential. Clinical and biologic implications.

L Cheng1, R M Neumann, D G Bostwick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the long term outcomes of patients with papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential (LMP) is limited.
METHODS: The authors studied 112 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with papillary urothelial neoplasms of LMP (formerly Ta, World Health Organization Grade 1 of 3 papillary urothelial carcinoma) at the Mayo Clinic between 1958 and 1963. All histologic slides were reviewed and fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology classification system.
RESULTS: Patient age at diagnosis ranged from 33 to 99 years (mean, 65 years). The male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The mean follow-up was 12.8 years (range, 0.1-35 years; median, 11.7 years). Twelve patients had biopsy-proven, noninvasive urothelial carcinoma; 17 patients had cystoscopically detected recurrences (all were treated by fulguration without biopsy); and 4 patients developed invasive urothelial carcinoma (including 2 with muscle-invasive carcinoma). Twelve (75%) of 16 patients with biopsy-proven recurrence or progression had cancer dedifferentiation, which resulted in a diagnosis of higher grade cancer than was indicated on initial biopsies. The mean interval from initial diagnosis to development of invasive carcinoma was 13.3 years (range, 10-14 years). Three patients died of bladder cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with papillary urothelial neoplasms of LMP have increased risks of local recurrence, progression, and death from bladder carcinoma. Long term clinical follow-up may be indicated for patient management. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10570438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Histological grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic value of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification system and comparison with conventional grading systems.

Authors:  J W A Oosterhuis; R F M Schapers; M L G Janssen-Heijnen; R P E Pauwels; D W Newling; F ten Kate
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  R Montironi; A Lopez-Beltran; R Mazzucchelli; D G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Chemoprevention of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dragan J Golijanin; David Kakiashvili; Ralph R Madeb; Edward M Messing; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential.

Authors:  M Scarpelli; R Montironi; L M Tarquini; P W Hamilton; A López Beltran; J Ranger-Moore; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  In the cystoscopic follow-up of non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma, NMP-22 works for high grades, but unreliable in low grades and upper urinary tract tumors.

Authors:  Enis Coskuner; Ibrahim Cevik; Alp Ozkan; Ozdal Dillioglugil; Atıf Akdas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Histologic grading of urothelial papillary neoplasms: impact of combined grading (two-numbered grading system) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Burçin Tuna; Kutsal Yörükoglu; Ender Düzcan; Sait Sen; Nalan Nese; Banu Sarsık; Aysegul Akder; Sehnaz Sayhan; Uğur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  [Urinary bladder tumours. The new 2004 WHO classification].

Authors:  M Seitz; D Zaak; R Knüchel-Clarke; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Kutsal Yorukoglu; Burcin Tuna; Emel Dikicioglu; Ender Duzcan; Aydin Isisag; Sait Sen; Ugur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  The 1973 WHO Classification is more suitable than the 2004 WHO Classification for predicting prognosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Zhongqing Chen; Weihong Ding; Ke Xu; Jun Tan; Chuanyu Sun; Yuancheng Gou; Shijun Tong; Guowei Xia; Zujun Fang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.