BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to elucidate the prognostic significance of a three-grade system for lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). METHODS: The prognostic significance of the grading of LVSI as compared with other pathologic variables was evaluated in a study of 303 Japanese women with endometrial carcinoma. The criteria for determining the grade of LVSI were as follows: none (no LVSI), mild (a focus of LVSI was recognized around a tumor), and severe (diffuse or multifocal LVSI were recognized around the tumor or in the myometrium regardless of the degree of myometrial invasion). Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. The effects of different surgical methods and adjuvant therapies on survival were also examined. RESULTS: A univariate survival analysis showed that survival significantly correlated with surgical stage, histologic grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical invasion, ovarian metastasis, and tubal metastasis. Of the three grades of LVSI, survival showed the most difference between the mild and severe groups. In multivariate analysis, the highest correlation with survival was observed for LVSI (P = 0.0008). Lymph node metastasis was also significantly associated with LVSI (P = 0. 0001). The correlation between histologic variables and survival was only slightly influenced by the differences in surgical methods and adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The grading of LVSI was found to be an important histologic prognostic variable. The severe degree of LVSI also was found to be a good indicator of lymph node metastasis. It is therefore important to evaluate the grade of LVSI based on a histologic examination of at least one cut surface of the hysterectomy specimen that macroscopically shows the deepest myometrial invasion. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to elucidate the prognostic significance of a three-grade system for lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). METHODS: The prognostic significance of the grading of LVSI as compared with other pathologic variables was evaluated in a study of 303 Japanese women with endometrial carcinoma. The criteria for determining the grade of LVSI were as follows: none (no LVSI), mild (a focus of LVSI was recognized around a tumor), and severe (diffuse or multifocal LVSI were recognized around the tumor or in the myometrium regardless of the degree of myometrial invasion). Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. The effects of different surgical methods and adjuvant therapies on survival were also examined. RESULTS: A univariate survival analysis showed that survival significantly correlated with surgical stage, histologic grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical invasion, ovarian metastasis, and tubal metastasis. Of the three grades of LVSI, survival showed the most difference between the mild and severe groups. In multivariate analysis, the highest correlation with survival was observed for LVSI (P = 0.0008). Lymph node metastasis was also significantly associated with LVSI (P = 0. 0001). The correlation between histologic variables and survival was only slightly influenced by the differences in surgical methods and adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The grading of LVSI was found to be an important histologic prognostic variable. The severe degree of LVSI also was found to be a good indicator of lymph node metastasis. It is therefore important to evaluate the grade of LVSI based on a histologic examination of at least one cut surface of the hysterectomy specimen that macroscopically shows the deepest myometrial invasion. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Yushen Qian; Erqi L Pollom; Chika Nwachukwu; Kira Seiger; Rie von Eyben; Ann K Folkins; Elizabeth A Kidd Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ricardo dos Reis; Jennifer K Burzawa; Audrey T Tsunoda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Michael Frumovitz; Shannon N Westin; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Izaskun Valduvieco; Angeles Rovirosa; Lluis Colomo; Alex De San Juan; Jaume Pahisa; Albert Biete Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Soledad Jorge; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Yongmei Huang; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Elke E M Peters; Carla Bartosch; W Glenn McCluggage; Catherine Genestie; Sigurd F Lax; Remi Nout; Jan Oosting; Naveena Singh; Huub C S H Smit; Vincent T H B M Smit; Koen K Van de Vijver; Tjalling Bosse Journal: Histopathology Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Koji Matsuo; Todd B Sheridan; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Takahito Miyake; Karina E Hew; Dwight D Im; Neil B Rosenshein; Seiji Mabuchi; Takayuki Enomoto; Tadashi Kimura; Anil K Sood; Lynda D Roman Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Alvaro Tejerizo-García; Jesús S Jiménez-López; José L Muñoz-González; Sara Bartolomé-Sotillos; Laura Marqueta-Marqués; Gregorio López-González; José F Pérez-Regadera Gómez Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 4.147