Conventional clinicopathologic prognostic factors in surgically resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. A comparison of prognostic factors for each pathologic TNM stage based on multivariate analyses.

BACKGROUND: A number of prognostic factors have been reported for resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. None of them, however, has been reported to have greater prognostic impact than the pathologic TNM staging system. The authors evaluated 18 conventional clinicopathologic prognostic factors in each pathologic stage.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on surgically resected 836 lung carcinoma patients, and the following conventional prognostic factors were evaluated in multivariate analyses: age, gender, pack-year smoking, serum carcinoembryonic antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels, laterality of tumor, clinical N status, histologic type of tumor, greatest tumor dimension, grade of differentiation, pleural involvement, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, degree of fibrosing scarring, nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, and curativity of resection.
RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 63.8%. In 430 cases of pathologic Stage I disease, multivariate analyses revealed 3 significant prognostic factors: clinical N status (P < 0.001), vascular invasion (P = 0.001), and curativity of resection (P < 0.001). In 406 cases of more advanced disease, i.e., pathologic Stage II, IIIA, IIIB, or IV, multivariate analyses revealed 4 factors as significant: histology (P = 0.001), pathologic N status (P < 0.001), tumor size (P < 0.001), and curativity of resection (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional clinicopathologic prognostic factors had a different impact on prognosis in each pathologic TNM stage among patients who underwent surgical resection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. These factors should be analyzed separately in each pathologic TNM stage. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.