BACKGROUND: Several techniques are available for the endoscopic treatment of gastric intramucosal cancers, but their advantages and disadvantages have not been adequately evaluated. We compared the therapeutic usefulness of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy with that of strip biopsy. METHODS: Between May 1995 and May 1997, we performed strip biopsy (May 1995 through February 1996) or endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (March 1996 through May 1997) in a consecutive series of patients with intestinal-type intramucosal cancer. Parameters of assessment included the following: size of removed specimens, en bloc resection rate, time required for resection, duration of hospitalization, and complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients with gastric intramucosal cancers underwent endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and 44 underwent strip biopsy. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and lesion macroscopic appearance, size, and site. The mean longest diameter of the resected specimens was significantly greater with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (20.3 +/- 3.4 mm) than with strip biopsy (15. 8 +/- 4.4 mm) (p < 0.001). The rate of en bloc resection (resection of an entire lesion in one procedure) was significantly higher with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (61.2%, 30 of 49) than with strip biopsy (36.4%, 16 of 44) (p < 0.05). The number of specimens obtained by piecemeal resection was slightly, but not significantly, higher with strip biopsy (2.4 +/- 1.7) than with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (2.0 +/- 1.7). The time required for treatment was similar for each procedure. The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (12.8 +/- 5.3 days) than with strip biopsy (15.9 +/- 74 days) (p < 0.05). As for complications, the rate of bleeding was 20. 5% (9 of 44) with strip biopsy and 10.2% (5 of 49) with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy; bleeding was controlled in all cases by treatment with a heater probe. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection of large gastric intramucosal tumors is easier with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy compared with strip biopsy. Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy is a useful procedure for en bloc resection.
BACKGROUND: Several techniques are available for the endoscopic treatment of gastric intramucosal cancers, but their advantages and disadvantages have not been adequately evaluated. We compared the therapeutic usefulness of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy with that of strip biopsy. METHODS: Between May 1995 and May 1997, we performed strip biopsy (May 1995 through February 1996) or endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (March 1996 through May 1997) in a consecutive series of patients with intestinal-type intramucosal cancer. Parameters of assessment included the following: size of removed specimens, en bloc resection rate, time required for resection, duration of hospitalization, and complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients with gastric intramucosal cancers underwent endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and 44 underwent strip biopsy. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and lesion macroscopic appearance, size, and site. The mean longest diameter of the resected specimens was significantly greater with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (20.3 +/- 3.4 mm) than with strip biopsy (15. 8 +/- 4.4 mm) (p < 0.001). The rate of en bloc resection (resection of an entire lesion in one procedure) was significantly higher with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (61.2%, 30 of 49) than with strip biopsy (36.4%, 16 of 44) (p < 0.05). The number of specimens obtained by piecemeal resection was slightly, but not significantly, higher with strip biopsy (2.4 +/- 1.7) than with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (2.0 +/- 1.7). The time required for treatment was similar for each procedure. The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (12.8 +/- 5.3 days) than with strip biopsy (15.9 +/- 74 days) (p < 0.05). As for complications, the rate of bleeding was 20. 5% (9 of 44) with strip biopsy and 10.2% (5 of 49) with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy; bleeding was controlled in all cases by treatment with a heater probe. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection of large gastric intramucosal tumors is easier with endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy compared with strip biopsy. Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy is a useful procedure for en bloc resection.