Literature DB >> 10570054

9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl) derivatives of purine nucleotide analogs: A comparison of their metabolism and interaction with cellular DNA synthesis.

P Kramata1, K M Downey.   

Abstract

Incubation of CEM cells for 24 h with the guanine, 2,6-diaminopurine, and adenine nucleotide analogs of the 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl) series, 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)guanine (PMEG), 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP), and 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA), was found to inhibit DNA synthesis 50% at concentrations of 1, 6, and 25 microM, respectively. Possible reasons for the marked differences were investigated, including cellular transport of the analogs, different efficiencies of intracellular phosphorylation, differential effects on 2'-deoxynucleotide (dNTP) pools, and differences in the affinities of the cellular DNA polymerases for the diphosphate derivatives of the drugs. No significant differences in cellular uptake were found among the analogs; however, they did differ in the efficiency of phosphorylation, i.e., CEM cells were found to accumulate higher levels of PMEG-diphosphate (PMEGpp) than PMEDAP-diphosphate (PMEDAPpp) or PMEA-diphosphate (PMEApp). Treatment of cells with any of the nucleotide analogs resulted in increased dNTP pools, with PMEG producing the greatest increase. All three analogs had the greatest effect on the dATP pool size, whereas the dGTP pool size was not significantly affected. Comparison of the ratios of nucleotide analog diphosphates to their corresponding dNTPs under conditions where DNA synthesis is inhibited 50% suggested that cellular DNA polymerases were approximately twice as sensitive to PMEGpp than to PMEDAPpp and 5-fold more sensitive to PMEGpp than to PMEApp. Consistent with this hypothesis, examination of the efficiencies with which the replicative DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon incorporated the analogs showed that DNA polymerase delta, the most sensitive of the DNA polymerases, incorporated PMEGpp twice as efficiently as PMEDAPpp and 7-fold more efficiently than PMEApp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10570054     DOI: 10.1124/mol.56.6.1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  7 in total

1.  Tenofovir diphosphate is a poor substrate and a weak inhibitor of rat DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon*.

Authors:  Gabriel Birkus; Miroslav Hájek; Pavel Kramata; Ivan Votruba; Antonín Holý; Berta Otová
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Presteady state kinetic investigation of the incorporation of anti-hepatitis B nucleotide analogues catalyzed by noncanonical human DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Jessica A Brown; Lindsey R Pack; Jason D Fowler; Zucai Suo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Evaluation of ODE-Bn-PMEG, an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate prodrug, as an antiviral against productive HPV infection in 3D organotypic epithelial cultures.

Authors:  N Sanjib Banerjee; Hsu-Kun Wang; James R Beadle; Karl Y Hostetler; Louise T Chow
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  GS-9191 is a novel topical prodrug of the nucleotide analog 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)guanine with antiproliferative activity and possible utility in the treatment of human papillomavirus lesions.

Authors:  Grushenka H I Wolfgang; Riri Shibata; Jianying Wang; Adrian S Ray; Sylvia Wu; Edward Doerrfler; Hans Reiser; William A Lee; Gabriel Birkus; Neil D Christensen; Graciela Andrei; Robert Snoeck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of 9-(S)-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine against Schistosomiasis mansoni in mice.

Authors:  Sanaa Botros; Samia William; Olfat Hammam; Zdenĕk Zídek; Antonín Holý
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Antiviral activities of MCC-478, a novel and specific inhibitor of hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Naohiro Kamiya; Atsushi Kubota; Yumiko Iwase; Kouichi Sekiya; Masaru Ubasawa; Satoshi Yuasa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro comparison of antiviral drugs against feline herpesvirus 1.

Authors:  K van der Meulen; B Garré; S Croubels; H Nauwynck
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.