Literature DB >> 10569526

Laparoscopic v laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy in the porcine model.

D A West1, M C Rallo, R G Moore, G A Vogler, M Niehoff, R O Parra, C Varma, G S Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an established procedure in the porcine model. We sought to compare intraoperative variables between live laparoscopic (LAP) and laparoscopy-assisted (LAP-A) donor nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight domestic pigs underwent either traditional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (N = 4) or laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy (N = 4) using the Pneumosleeve followed by conventional heterotopic autotransplantation.
RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the groups with regard to vessel length, ureteral length, or postoperative urine output. The operating room time was 108+/-12 minutes in the LAP group v 75.8+/-10.3 minutes in the LAP-A group (P = 0.0065). Although the difference was not statistically significant, warm ischemic time, tended to be lower in the LAP-A than the LAP group: 70+/-3.0 seconds v 135+/-57 seconds, respectively (P = 0.059). Graft survival was identical in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy-assisted (via Pneumosleeve) live donor nephrectomy shortens the operative time without affecting graft survival in the domestic swine model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10569526     DOI: 10.1089/end.1999.13.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  1 in total

1.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve.

Authors:  W A Bemelman; R C van Doorn; L T de Wit; C Kox; J Surachno; O R Busch; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.