Literature DB >> 10569490

In situ force distribution in the glenohumeral joint capsule during anterior-posterior loading.

R E Debski1, E K Wong, S L Woo, M Sakane, F H Fu, J J Warner.   

Abstract

Our objective was to examine the function of the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments during application of an anterior-posterior load by directly measuring the in situ force distribution in these structures as well as the compliance of the joint. We hypothesized that interaction between different regions of the capsule due to its continuous nature results in a complex force distribution throughout the glenohumeral joint capsule. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the force distribution in the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments of intact shoulder specimens and the joint kinematics resulting from the application of external loads at four abduction angles. Our results suggest that the glenohumeral capsule carries no force when the humeral head is centered in the glenoid with the humerus in anatomic rotation. However, once an anterior-posterior load is applied to the joint, the glenohumeral ligaments carry force (during anterior loading, the superior glenohumeral-coracohumeral ligaments carried 26+/-16 N at 0 degrees and the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament carried 30+/-21 N at 90 degrees). Therefore, the patient's ability to use the arm with the humerus in anatomic rotation should not be limited following repair procedures for shoulder instability because the repaired capsuloligamentous structures should not carry force during this motion. Separation of the capsule into its components revealed that forces are being transmitted between each region and that the glenohumeral ligaments do not act as traditional ligaments that carry a pure tensile force along their length. The interrelationship of the glenohumeral ligaments forms the biomechanical basis for the capsular shift procedure. The compliance of the joint under our loading conditions indicates that the passive properties of the capsule provide little resistance to motion of the humerus during 10 mm of anterior or posterior translation with anatomic humeral rotation. Finally, this knowledge also enhances the understanding of arm positioning relative to the portion of the glenohumeral capsule that limits translation during examination under anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10569490     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100170523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  16 in total

1.  Subscapularis partial tear nodule causing shoulder rotational triggering.

Authors:  Zubair Wani; Rajesh Mangattil; Tim Butterfield; Kevin Hildebrand; Srinath Kamineni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A method for predicting collagen fiber realignment in non-planar tissue surfaces as applied to glenohumeral capsule during clinically relevant deformation.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Amini; Carrie A Voycheck; Richard E Debski
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Thomas L Willett; Andrew P Dold; Massimo Petrera; David Wasserstein; Danny B Whelan; John S Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Definition of the capsular insertion plane on the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Sanjay M Sanghavi; Srinath Kamineni; Roman Skourat; Ulrich N Hansen; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  A biomechanical analysis of the soft tissue and osseous constraints of the hip joint.

Authors:  Matthew V Smith; Ryan S Costic; Robert Allaire; Peter L Schilling; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effects of simulated injury on the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule.

Authors:  Carrie A Rainis; Andrew J Brown; Patrick J McMahon; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Identification of spinal tissues loaded by manual therapy: a robot-based serial dissection technique applied in porcine motion segments.

Authors:  Gregory N Kawchuk; Alejandro Carrasco; Grayson Beecher; Darrell Goertzen; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Finding consistent strain distributions in the glenohumeral capsule between two subjects: implications for development of physical examinations.

Authors:  Nicholas J Drury; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss; Patrick J McMahon; Richard E Debski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effect of humeral head defect size on glenohumeral stability: a cadaveric study of simulated Hill-Sachs defects.

Authors:  Scott G Kaar; Stephen D Fening; Morgan H Jones; Robb W Colbrunn; Anthony Miniaci
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Finite element modelling of the glenohumeral capsule can help assess the tested region during a clinical exam.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ellis; Nicholas J Drury; Susan M Moore; Patrick J McMahon; Jeffrey A Weiss; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.