Literature DB >> 10569338

Stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion.

G B Danzi1, C Capuano, L Fiocca, F Dallavalle, S Pirelli, L Mauri, E Quaini.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion. A total of 122 patients were randomized to receive a stent with or without predilation; direct stent placement was possible in 59 of the 61 patients (97%) with an immediate and long-term clinical follow-up similar to that observed in the group of patients treated conventionally.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10569338     DOI： 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00540-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN： 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients.

Authors:  H Le Breton; J Boschat; P Commeau; P Brunel; M Gilard; C Breut; O Bar; P Geslin; A Tirouvanziam; L Maillard; B Moquet; P Barragan; P Dupouy; G Grollier; J Berland; P Druelles; R Rihani; B Huret; C Leclercq; M Bedossa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Safety, efficacy and costs associated with direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A IJsselmuiden; P W Serruys; G J Tangelder; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken; F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Is coronary stent deployment and remodeling affected by predilatation? An intravascular ultrasound randomized study Stenting with or without predilation: an IVUS study.

Authors:  Jacques Boschat; Hervé Le Breton; P Commeau; Bernard Huret; Marc Bedossa; Martine Gilard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.