Literature DB >> 10569321

Differences between men and women in the management of unstable angina pectoris (The GUARANTEE Registry). The GUARANTEE Investigators.

B M Scirica1, D J Moliterno, N R Every, H V Anderson, F V Aguirre, C B Granger, C T Lambrew, L E Rabbani, A Arnold, S K Sapp, J E Booth, J J Ferguson, C P Cannon.   

Abstract

Few data are available in prospectively collected cohorts of patients with unstable angina pectoris or on the use of appropriate medications or interventions. Accordingly, we evaluated 2,948 consecutive patients with unstable angina admitted to 35 hospitals in the United States in 1996, and comparing men and women (39% of the patients were women). Differences were seen in coronary risk profiles with a higher incidence of systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a family history of coronary disease in women. Women were less likely to receive Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR) recommended pharmacologic treatment than men. Cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass was performed less often in women compared with men (44% vs. 53%, p = 0.002; 12% vs. 18%, p = 0.02; 7% vs. 10%, p = 0.001, respectively). At catheterization, women were more likely to have no significant coronary artery disease (25% vs. 14%, p = 0.001). Although fewer women than men fulfilled the AHCPR criteria for cardiac catheterization (54% vs. 64%, p = 0.001), a similar rate of men and women with positive criteria underwent catheterization and angioplasty. However, fewer women with positive criteria underwent bypass surgery (36% vs. 46%, p = 0.03). More men "ruled-in" for a myocardial infarction at admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), but there was no difference in recurrent angina, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or death. Despite different epidemiologic profiles and less evidence of coronary artery disease by noninvasive and invasive tests, women and men had similar outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10569321     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00525-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

Review 1.  Utilization of guidelines and computer-based technology to achieve optimal care in atherothrombotic vascular disease.

Authors:  Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Incidence and Predictors of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and the Role of Cardiac Troponin Assays in Patients with Unstable Angina.

Authors:  Sushan Yang; Nirmanmoh Bhatia; Meng Xu; John A McPherson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  The association of angina pectoris with heart disease mortality among men and women by diabetes status: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  Kimbach T Carpiuc; Deborah L Wingard; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Pre- and early in-hospital procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes: first results of the "German chest pain unit registry".

Authors:  Felix Post; Evangelos Giannitsis; Thomas Riemer; Lars S Maier; Claus Schmitt; Burghard Schumacher; Gerd Heusch; Harald Mudra; Thomas Voigtländer; Rainer Erbel; Harald Darius; Hugo Katus; Christian Hamm; Jochen Senges; Tommaso Gori; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Trends in the hospital management of unstable angina.

Authors:  R F Heller; H Powell; R L O'Connell; K D'Este; L L Lim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  "Hot" unstable angina--is it worse than subacute unstable angina? Results from the GUARANTEE Registry.

Authors:  N K Sekaran; D J Moliterno; J J Ferguson; N Every; H V Anderson; F V Aguirre; W J French; S Sapp; J E Booth; C B Granger; C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joakim Alfredsson; Ulf Stenestrand; Lars Wallentin; Eva Swahn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance Atlas on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 6: Sex- and Gender-Specific Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Monica Parry; Harriette G C Van Spall; Kerri-Anne Mullen; Sharon L Mulvagh; Christine Pacheco; Tracey J F Colella; Marie-Annick Clavel; Shahin Jaffer; Heather J A Foulds; Jasmine Grewal; Marsha Hardy; Jennifer A D Price; Anna L E Levinsson; Christine A Gonsalves; Colleen M Norris
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2022-04-19

9.  Gender differences in aspirin use among adults with coronary heart disease in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; J Michael McWilliams; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Association between gender, process of care measures, and outcomes in ACS in India: results from the detection and management of coronary heart disease (DEMAT) registry.

Authors:  Neha J Pagidipati; Mark D Huffman; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Rajeev Gupta; Prakash Negi; Thannikot M Jaison; Satyavan Sharma; Nakul Sinha; Padinhare Mohanan; B G Muralidhara; Sasidharan Bijulal; Sivasubramonian Sivasankaran; Vijay K Puri; Jacob Jose; K Srinath Reddy; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.