Literature DB >> 10567435

Differentiation of separated mouse mammary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells cultured on EHS matrix analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence of cytoskeletal antigens.

M J Smalley1, J Titley, H Paterson, N Perusinghe, C Clarke, M J O'Hare.   

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that purified virgin mouse mammary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells promiscuously express cell type-specific cytokeratins when they are cloned in vitro. Changes in cytokeratin expression may be indicators of the loss or change of the differentiated identity of a cell. To investigate the factors that may be responsible for the maintenance of differentiated cellular identity, specifically cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, we cloned flow-sorted mouse mammary epithelial cells on the extracellular matrix (ECM) derived from the Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm murine sarcoma (EHS matrix). Changes in cell differentiation on EHS, compared with culture on glass, were analyzed by comparing patterns of cytokeratin expression. The results indicate that ECM is responsible for maintenance of the differentiated identity of basal/myoepithelial cells and prevents the inappropriate expression of luminal antigens seen on glass or plastic. Luminal cell identity in the form of retention of luminal markers and absence of basal/myoepithelial antigens, on the contrary, appears to depend on homotypic cell-cell contacts and interactions. The results also show that luminal cells (or a subpopulation of them) can generate a cell layer that expresses only basal cytokeratin markers (and no luminal cytokeratin markers) and may form a pluripotent compartment. (J Histochem Cytochem 47:1513-1524, 1999)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10567435     DOI: 10.1177/002215549904701203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  33 in total

1.  Isolation, immortalization, and characterization of a human breast epithelial cell line with stem cell properties.

Authors:  Thorarinn Gudjonsson; René Villadsen; Helga Lind Nielsen; Lone Rønnov-Jessen; Mina J Bissell; Ole William Petersen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Mammary epithelial stem cells: transplantation and self-renewal analysis.

Authors:  Gilbert H Smith; Corinne A Boulanger
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 3.  Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions.

Authors:  Karen L Schmeichel; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Localization of putative stem cells and four cell populations with different differentiation degree in mouse mammary anlagen.

Authors:  Jianyong Han; Suying Cao; Hong Jin; Ying Liu; Meili Wang; Jiazhe Song; Ning Li
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 5.  Isolation and characterization of human mammary stem cells.

Authors:  R B Clarke
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Lineage-specific markers of goat mammary cells in primary culture.

Authors:  Sonja Prpar Mihevc; Jernej Ogorevc; Peter Dovc
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Stromal-epithelial interactions in aging and cancer: senescent fibroblasts alter epithelial cell differentiation.

Authors:  Simona Parrinello; Jean-Philippe Coppe; Ana Krtolica; Judith Campisi
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  SLUG: Critical regulator of epithelial cell identity in breast development and cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Phillips; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Pregnancy in the mature adult mouse does not alter the proportion of mammary epithelial stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Kara L Britt; Howard Kendrick; Joseph L Regan; Gemma Molyneux; Fiona-Ann Magnay; Alan Ashworth; Matthew J Smalley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Transcriptome analysis of mammary epithelial subpopulations identifies novel determinants of lineage commitment and cell fate.

Authors:  Howard Kendrick; Joseph L Regan; Fiona-Ann Magnay; Anita Grigoriadis; Costas Mitsopoulos; Marketa Zvelebil; Matthew J Smalley
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.