Literature DB >> 10566465

A critical appraisal of the use of Internet for calculating cardiovascular risk.

P Gillois1, I Colombet, H Dréau, P Degoulet, G Chatellier.   

Abstract

This paper aims to retrieve and evaluate the quality of the Internet sites providing information on cardiovascular risk. We searched web pages related to risk prediction using six search engines. Sites proposing a cardiovascular risk prediction were selected for evaluation. The quality of each site was checked against criteria testing the validity, type and potential usefulness of information for physicians or patients. Search engines retrieved about 50 10(6) web pages. Eight sites were included. Only 2 of them provided calculation of cardiovascular risk based on Framingham equation. The others proposed algorithms, guidelines, or general information on cardiovascular health. Most sites lacked details to ensure quality of information. Present search engines are inefficient to retrieve precise and valid information. Facing the inflation of medical information, a systematic approach to validate the quality of a site is mandatory. Application of Evidence Based Medicine concepts gives a solution for evaluation of internet-based medical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566465      PMCID: PMC2232666     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.

Authors:  P Kim; T R Eng; M J Deering; A Maxfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

2.  Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home.

Authors:  P Impicciatore; C Pandolfini; N Casella; M Bonati
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

3.  The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  G Worrall; P Chaulk; D Freake
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The absolute risk as a guide to influence the treatment decision-making process in mild hypertension.

Authors:  G Chatellier; J Ménard
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

7.  Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D L Sackett; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D J Cook; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Users' guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A Laupacis; G Wells; W S Richardson; P Tugwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Making sense of cancer risk calculators on the web.

Authors:  Andrea Gurmankin Levy; Seema S Sonnad; Jibby E Kurichi; Melani Sherman; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gerlinde Lenaerts; Geertruida E Bekkering; Martine Goossens; Leen De Coninck; Nicolas Delvaux; Sam Cordyn; Jef Adriaenssens; Patrick Vankrunkelsven
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.