Literature DB >> 10566401

An institution-based process to ensure clinical software quality.

S A Abookire1, J M Teich, D W Bates.   

Abstract

Clinical software can have a major impact on the delivery of care. It is imperative that clinical software undergo regular quality review, to evaluate the clinical correctness of the specification, the technical correctness of the software, problems that have arisen, and maintenance of the software as conditions change. We have developed a process using existing hospital review groups to perform clinical review, and using a project specification form and analysis of likely problem areas to effect technical review.

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10566401      PMCID： PMC2232604     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN： 1531-605X


  6 in total

1.  Read Code quality assurance: from simple syntax to semantic stability.

Authors:  E B Schulz; J W Barrett; C Price
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Testing and validation of computerized decision support systems.

Authors:  R M Sailors; T D East; C J Wallace; D A Carlson; M A Franklin; L K Heermann; A T Kinder; R L Bradshaw; A G Randolph; A H Morris
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

3.  Automated tuberculosis detection.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; C A Knirsch; N L Jain; A Pablos-Mendez
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Validation of medical software: present policy of the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  F E Young
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Summary recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American Medical Informatics Association, The Computer-based Patient Record Institute, The Medical Library Association, The Association of Academic Health Science Libraries, The American Health Information Management Association, and The American Nurses Association.

Authors:  R A Miller; R M Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems.

Authors:  H J Murff; J Kannry
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Test Case Selection in Pre-Deployment Testing of Complex Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Tso; Kaeli Yuen; Susana Martins; Samson W Tu; Michael Ashcraft; Paul Heidenreich; Brian B Hoffman; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2016-07-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.