Literature DB >> 10566368

Telephone interviews vs. workstation sessions for acquiring quality of life data.

M W Kattan1, P A Fearn, S B Cantor, J Hu, M E Cowen, R B Giesler, B J Miles.   

Abstract

Patient quality of life data can be acquired in a variety of ways, including over the telephone and through computerized questionnaires. However, if the method of collection produces different results, medical decisions regarding appropriate and cost-effective care may be influenced by collection method. We conducted an experiment where subjects had two quality of life measures, the time trade-off and rating scale utilities, assessed both in telephone interivews and via computer touchscreens. The order of telephone and touchscreen was randomized. We found that rating scale utilities were similar whether obtained via the telephone or via touchscreen regardless of which was done first. However, patients who had their time trade-off utilities assessed over the telephone first did not provide as consistent responses as those elicited first via touchscreen (p = 0.01). Caution is suggested when considering eliciting time trade-off over the telephone with subjects who have not had time trade-off elicited previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566368      PMCID: PMC2232849     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  7 in total

1.  Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Feeny
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.

Authors:  A E Clarke; M K Goldstein; D Michelson; A M Garber; L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Comparison of time-tradeoff utilities and rating scale values of cancer patients and their relatives: evidence for a possible plateau relationship.

Authors:  J F O'Leary; D L Fairclough; M K Jankowski; J C Weeks
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; E C Thiel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The danger of applying group-level utilities in decision analyses of the treatment of localized prostate cancer in individual patients.

Authors:  M E Cowen; B J Miles; D F Cahill; R B Giesler; J R Beck; M W Kattan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The reliability and internal consistency of an Internet-capable computer program for measuring utilities.

Authors:  L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.