Literature DB >> 10563535

The CLO test in the UK: inappropriate reading and missed results.

M I Prince1, J S Osborne, L Ingoe, D E Jones, I Cobden, J R Barton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In endoscopy units, the CLO test is frequently used to detect Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Informal survey suggested that practice deviated from that recommended, with little account taken of possible confounders such as acid-suppressing medication.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of reading time and acid suppression on CLO tests and to estimate impact on test results in UK endoscopy units.
DESIGN: Survey of use of CLO tests. Prospective study of time to positivity and concurrent medication in CLO tests from 782 patients.
SETTING: Forty-eight endoscopy units throughout the UK, and a district hospital endoscopy unit. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen endoscopy units in the old Northern Region, and a random sample of 30 other UK units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time of reading of CLO tests in UK units, and time to positivity of CLO tests in one hospital.
RESULTS: Endoscopy units most frequently used CLO tests to assess H. pylori colonization, with marked differences in the times when tests were read. Nineteen out of 37 units discarded tests considerably earlier than the recommended 24 h. Over 20% of CLO tests became positive more than 2 h after collection, with 11% taking 24 h to change colour. Acid-suppressing medication prolonged time to positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of endoscopy units read tests earlier than recommended. Acid-suppressing medication delays the development of CLO tests and may increase numbers of false-negative tests. Endoscopy units should read tests at 24 h and preferably test patients off ulcer healing medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10563535     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199911000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  6 in total

1.  Detection of Helicobacter pylori: A faster urease test can save resources.

Authors:  Andriani Koumi; Theodoros Filippidis; Vassilia Leontara; Loukia Makri; Marios Zenon Panos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Francis Mégraud; Philippe Lehours
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A time-saving-modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test.

Authors:  Chi-Chen Fan; Chung-Hsing Chen; Chi Chou; Ting-Yu Kao; An Ning Cheng; Alan Yueh-Luen Lee; Cheng-Liang Kuo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Gastric Aspirates Using a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Test.

Authors:  Ho Dong Kim; Do Hyun Kim; Hyeuk Park; Woo Jong Kim; Yong Soo Ahn; Young Jik Lee; Sun Mi Park; Eun Seon Seo; Chul Park; Yang Ho Kim; Hyung Rag Kim; Young Eun Joo; Young Do Jung
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  Validation of an in-house made rapid urease test kit against the commercial CLO-test in detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in the patients with gastric disorders.

Authors:  Maneli Amin Shahidi; Mohammad Reza Fattahi; Shohreh Farshad; Abdolvahab Alborzi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  New monoclonal antibody-based test for Helicobacter pylori urease in gastric tissue.

Authors:  Do Hyun Kim; Ho Dong Kim; Hyeuk Park; Seung Choi; Jae Won Beom; Woo Jong Kim; Chang Kook Park; Young Jik Lee; Ju Young Park; Hyung Rag Kim; Chul Park; Young Eun Joo; Young Do Jung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.