Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth.

Literature DB >> 1056343

A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth.

R M Ricketts.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 1975 PMID： 1056343

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Orthod ISSN： 0022-3875

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

11 in total

1. Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.

Authors: Leonardo Henrique de Lima Araújo; Elton Gonçalves Zenóbio; Wellington Pacheco; Maurício Greco Cosso; Flávio Ricardo Manzi; Jamil Awad Shibli
Journal: Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2011-01-28

2. Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.

Authors: Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.079

3. [Form changes of the mandible by therapy and growth in skeletal retrognathism and dentoalveolar class II,1].

Authors: U Ehmer
Journal: Fortschr Kieferorthop Date: 1985-08

4. [Treatment problems in adult patients].

Authors: B Melsen
Journal: Fortschr Kieferorthop Date: 1983-02

5. Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.

Authors: Amritraj Jabbal; Martyn Cobourne; Nora Donaldson; Dirk Bister
Journal: Eur J Orthod Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.075

6. Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear.

Authors: Jin-Il Choi; Bong-Kuen Cha; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Dong-Soon Choi; In-San Jang
Journal: Korean J Orthod Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 1.372

A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth.

1. Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.

2. Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.

3. [Form changes of the mandible by therapy and growth in skeletal retrognathism and dentoalveolar class II,1].

4. [Treatment problems in adult patients].

5. Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.

6. Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear.

7. Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.

8. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.

9. Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the Ricketts analysis.

10. Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.