BACKGROUND: Chronic venous disorders in the general population are a significant socio-medical pathology. The importance and role of venous pathologies in the occupational field are underestimated and the data in the literature are incomplete and contradictory. METHODS: A study was made of 336 male workers: 112 industry workers, 120 stoneworkers, and 104 office workers. A targeted questionnaire was administered to all workers regarding occupational and extraoccupational risk factors for venous pathologies. The same workers were clinically examined, and a venous check-up and specific tests were done in clinostatic and orthostatic postures. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic venous disorders, including major and minor pathology, was significantly higher among industrial workers (39.28%) than among stoneworkers (24.16%, P=.019) and office workers (22.11%, P=.010). Only for major pathology was the mean age higher in phlebopathic workers than in non-phlebopathic; furthermore, the proportion of workers standing for >/=50% of the work shift was higher in phlebopathic than in non-phlebopathic. These differences were significant in all working groups. The results showed a positive relationship between the prevalence of phlebopathy and increased age and number of hours spent standing. Considering workers of the same age classes, a higher prevalence of phlebopathy was found between those who stood for >/=50% of their shift and those who stood for <50% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that professions involving standing, particularly for those standing for >/=50% of the shift, can influence the development of chronic venous disorders and a diagnostic clinical protocol to be used by occupational physicians in screening working populations for the prevention of venous disease is suggested. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Chronic venous disorders in the general population are a significant socio-medical pathology. The importance and role of venous pathologies in the occupational field are underestimated and the data in the literature are incomplete and contradictory. METHODS: A study was made of 336 male workers: 112 industry workers, 120 stoneworkers, and 104 office workers. A targeted questionnaire was administered to all workers regarding occupational and extraoccupational risk factors for venous pathologies. The same workers were clinically examined, and a venous check-up and specific tests were done in clinostatic and orthostatic postures. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic venous disorders, including major and minor pathology, was significantly higher among industrial workers (39.28%) than among stoneworkers (24.16%, P=.019) and office workers (22.11%, P=.010). Only for major pathology was the mean age higher in phlebopathic workers than in non-phlebopathic; furthermore, the proportion of workers standing for >/=50% of the work shift was higher in phlebopathic than in non-phlebopathic. These differences were significant in all working groups. The results showed a positive relationship between the prevalence of phlebopathy and increased age and number of hours spent standing. Considering workers of the same age classes, a higher prevalence of phlebopathy was found between those who stood for >/=50% of their shift and those who stood for <50% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that professions involving standing, particularly for those standing for >/=50% of the shift, can influence the development of chronic venous disorders and a diagnostic clinical protocol to be used by occupational physicians in screening working populations for the prevention of venous disease is suggested. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Aaron R Caldwell; Kaitlin M Gallagher; Benjamin T Harris; Megan E Rosa-Caldwell; Marcus Payne; Bryce Daniels; Matthew S Ganio Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Augustine A Acquah; Clive D'Souza; Bernard J Martin; John Arko-Mensah; Paul K Botwe; Prudence Tettey; Duah Dwomoh; Afua Amoabeng Nti; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia Takyi; Isabella A Quakyi; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil Journal: Int J Ind Ergon Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 2.656
Authors: Y Matsumoto; Y Asao; A Yoshikawa; H Sekiguchi; M Takada; M Furu; S Saito; M Kataoka; H Abe; T Yagi; K Togashi; M Toi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.379