Literature DB >> 10561651

Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: An eighteen-year experience.

A K Dayal1, F A Manning, D J Berck, G M Mussalli, C Avila, C R Harman, S Menticoglou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was our goal to determine the false-negative rate of the biophysical profile, characterize an 18-year variation in the false-negative rate, examine the relationship between the last normal biophysical profile score and death, and compare the false-negative rate of 2 disparate populations. STUDY
DESIGN: Biophysical profile scores of 86,955 patients at 2 medical centers were collected and recorded prospectively. All perinatal deaths occurring within 1 week of a normal score were similarly recorded. The annual false-negative rate, the cumulative false-negative rate, and the ratio of false-negative results in cases of subsequent fetal death to the perinatal mortality rate were calculated.
RESULTS: There were 65 fetal deaths among 86,955 fetuses. Over an 18-year study period at one institution, the false-negative rate varied but not significantly. The cumulative false-negative rate was 0.708 per 1000 at one medical center studied and 2.289 per 1000 at the other center. The average interval between last normal score and fetal death was 3.62 days and did not vary significantly between the medical centers.
CONCLUSIONS: False-negative results in cases of subsequent fetal death reflect events that are subsequent to the last normal test result. Fetomaternal hemorrhage was the single most identifiable fetal cause of false-negative results in cases of subsequent fetal death. The ratio of the false-negative rate in cases of subsequent fetal death to the perinatal mortality rate should be used as a more objective approach to reporting this value, because the false-negative rate likely reflects the underlying perinatal mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561651     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70114-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Brian M Mercer; Mary D'Alton; Sarah Kilpatrick; Sean Blackwell; George Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.623

2.  Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Roger K Freeman; Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.623

3.  Applicability of the rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal well-being assessment in high-risk pregnancies from a university hospital in são paulo, Brazil: preliminary results.

Authors:  Jonathan Mamber Czeresnia; Edward Araujo Júnior; Eduardo Cordioli; Wellington P Martins; Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza; Antonio Fernandes Moron
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.