Literature DB >> 10561637

Alternative methods of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.

L C Atilano1, A Lee-Parritz, E Lieberman, A P Cohen, R L Barbieri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an attempt to find more efficacious alternatives for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, we evaluated whether (1) there is a glucose loading test value above which all glucose tolerance test results are positive, (2) omission of the third-hour plasma glucose measurement of the glucose tolerance test alters the sensitivity of the test, and (3) the presence of a fasting plasma glucose concentration >/=105 mg/dL suffices as a diagnostic standard after an abnormal glucose loading test result. STUDY
DESIGN: The charts of 512 patients who underwent 3-hour glucose tolerance tests at our institution between January 1995 and December 1996 were reviewed. Only subjects for whom the glucose loading test yielded plasma glucose levels >/=140 mg/dL were selected. The positive predictive value of a glucose loading test result >/=185 mg/dL was calculated. Results of glucose tolerance tests of subjects with elevated fasting plasma glucose concentrations were then evaluated to determine the positive predictive value for gestational diabetes mellitus of an elevated fasting plasma glucose concentration.
RESULTS: Among the subjects who underwent glucose tolerance tests, 22% (114/512) met positive test criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. The positive predictive value for a glucose loading test result >/=185 mg/dL was 57% (25/44), whereas a glucose loading test result >199 mg/dL showed a positive predictive value of 69% (4/13). Omission of the third-hour glucose tolerance test value yielded a sensitivity of 87% (99/114). Among the 24 women with fasting plasma glucose concentrations >/=105 mg/dL, 96% had positive glucose tolerance test results. An elevated fasting plasma glucose concentration was highly associated with gestational diabetes mellitus necessitating insulin therapy (65%).
CONCLUSION: An elevated glucose loading test result was associated with but not highly predictive of gestational diabetes mellitus. Omission of the 3-hour glucose tolerance test measurement resulted in failure to diagnose 13% of gestational diabetes mellitus cases. A fasting plasma glucose concentration >/=105 mg/dL was highly predictive of an abnormal glucose tolerance test result among patients with an elevated glucose loading test value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561637     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Weight gain in early pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among Latinas.

Authors:  T A Moore Simas; M E Waring; K Callaghan; K Leung; M Ward Harvey; A Buabbud; L Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 6.041

2.  Difference between 2 h and 3 h 75 g glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): results from a national survey on prevalence of GDM.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Gao; Yu-Mei Wei; Hui-Xia Yang; Xian-Ming Xu; Ling Fan; Jing He; Ning Liu; San-Cun Zhao; Ya-Li Hu; Zi Yang; Yun-Ping Zhang; Xing-Hui Liu; Xu Chen; Jian-Ping Zhang; Wen-Li Gou; Mei Xiao; Hai-Rong Wu; Mei-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-08-10

3.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Screening with fasting plasma glucose.

Authors:  Mukesh M Agarwal
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-07-25

4.  A prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors for gestational diabetes among Hispanic women: design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; Renée Turzanski Fortner; Audra Gollenberg; John Buonnaccorsi; Nancy Dole; Glenn Markenson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  A randomized controlled trial of prenatal physical activity to prevent gestational diabetes: design and methods.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; Bess H Marcus; Edward Stanek; Joseph T Ciccolo; David X Marquez; Caren G Solomon; Glenn Markenson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  The utility of a single test to identify women at risk for gestational diabetes.

Authors:  D A Sacks
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Markedly different rates of incident insulin treatment based on universal gestational diabetes mellitus screening in a diverse HMO population.

Authors:  Teresa A Hillier; Keith K Ogasawara; Kathryn L Pedula; Kimberly K Vesco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Human adipose tissue expansion in pregnancy is impaired in gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Raziel Rojas-Rodriguez; Lawrence M Lifshitz; Karl D Bellve; So Yun Min; Jacqueline Pires; Katherine Leung; Crina Boeras; Aylin Sert; Jacqueline T Draper; Silvia Corvera; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Patterns of gestational diabetes diagnosis inside and outside of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Jacinda M Nicklas; Chloe A Zera; Janet Lui; Ellen W Seely
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  How high is too high in cutoff levels from 50-g glucose challenge test.

Authors:  Hyun-Hwa Cha; Ji Ye Kim; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-05-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.