Literature DB >> 10561616

Domestic abuse in pregnancy: A comparison of a self-completed domestic abuse questionnaire with a directed interview.

J C Canterino1, L G VanHorn, J T Harrigan, C V Ananth, A M Vintzileos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of a standardized self-completed domestic abuse questionnaire with those of a directed interview in the identification of domestic abuse in pregnant patients. STUDY
DESIGN: All patients with a first prenatal visit between March 1 and September 30, 1997, were assessed for self-reported domestic abuse with a standardized domestic abuse questionnaire. This was followed by a directed interview that involved verbal review of the standardized domestic abuse questionnaire. Self-reported domestic abuse was defined as any positive response to the domestic abuse questionnaire or the directed interview. The number of patients with a positive response to either the standardized questionnaire or the directed interview, or both, were recorded. The 2 techniques were compared by the McNemar chi(2) test. The group demographics and characteristics were evaluated.
RESULTS: Among the 224 patients evaluated, a total of 36% (n = 80) of the patients reported domestic abuse by either method. The standardized domestic abuse questionnaire identified 85% (n = 68) compared with 59% (n = 47) by a directed interview (P =.03). The use of the standardized domestic abuse questionnaire and the directed interview in parallel identified an additional 15% (n = 12) of patients with domestic abuse.
CONCLUSION: A standardized domestic abuse questionnaire is superior to a directed interview in identifying self-reported domestic abuse in pregnancy. Utilizing both methods in parallel further increases the number of patients identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561616     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70079-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Louise M Howard; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.

Authors:  Ping-Hsin Chen; Sue Rovi; Judy Washington; Abbie Jacobs; Marielos Vega; Ko-Yu Pan; Mark S Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Assessing antenatal psychosocial health. Randomized controlled trial of two versions of the ALPHA form.

Authors:  Deana Midmer; Janet Bryanton; Rona Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaeko Kataoka; Yukari Yaju; Hiromi Eto; Shigeko Horiuchi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A knowledge, attitudes, and practice survey among obstetrician-gynaecologists on intimate partner violence in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  Kristien Roelens; Hans Verstraelen; Kathia Van Egmond; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Prevalence of common mental disorder and associated factors among pregnant women in South-East Ethiopia, 2017: a community based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ashenafi Mekonnen Woldetsadik; Abebaw Nigussie Ayele; Adem Esmael Roba; Genet Fikadu Haile; Khan Mubashir
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 7.  Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Rosario M Román-Gálvez; Sandra Martín-Peláez; Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Khalid Saeed Khan; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.