PURPOSE: We generated an anti-idiotype antibody, designated CeaVac, that is an internal image of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). We previously demonstrated that the majority of patients with advanced colorectal cancer generate specific anti-CEA responses. The purpose of the current study was to treat patients with surgically resected colon cancer with CeaVac to determine the immune response and clinical outcome to treatment with vaccine. We also compared the immune responses between patients treated with fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy regimens plus vaccine versus vaccine alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with resected Dukes' B, C, and D, and incompletely resected Dukes' D disease were treated with 2 mg of CeaVac every other week for four injections and then monthly until tumor recurrence or progression. Fourteen patients were treated concurrently with 5-FU chemotherapy regimens. RESULTS: All 32 patients entered onto this trial generated high-titer immunoglobulin G and T-cell proliferative immune responses against CEA. The 5-FU regimens did not have a qualitative or quantitative effect on the immune response. Three of 15 patients with Dukes' B and C disease progressed at 19, 24, and 35 months. Seven of eight patients with completely resected Dukes' D disease remained on study from 12 to 33 months; one patient with resected Dukes' D disease relapsed at 9 months. One patient with incompletely resected Dukes' D disease remained on study at 14 months without evidence of progression; eight experienced disease progression at 6 to 31 months. CONCLUSION: CeaVac consistently generated a potent anti-CEA humoral and cellular immune response in all 32 patients entered onto this trial. A number of very high-risk patients continue on study. 5-FU regimens, which are the standard of care for patients with Dukes' C disease, did not affect the immune response. These data warrant a phase III trial for patients with resected colon cancer.
PURPOSE: We generated an anti-idiotype antibody, designated CeaVac, that is an internal image of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). We previously demonstrated that the majority of patients with advanced colorectal cancer generate specific anti-CEA responses. The purpose of the current study was to treat patients with surgically resected colon cancer with CeaVac to determine the immune response and clinical outcome to treatment with vaccine. We also compared the immune responses between patients treated with fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy regimens plus vaccine versus vaccine alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with resected Dukes' B, C, and D, and incompletely resected Dukes' D disease were treated with 2 mg of CeaVac every other week for four injections and then monthly until tumor recurrence or progression. Fourteen patients were treated concurrently with 5-FU chemotherapy regimens. RESULTS: All 32 patients entered onto this trial generated high-titer immunoglobulin G and T-cell proliferative immune responses against CEA. The 5-FU regimens did not have a qualitative or quantitative effect on the immune response. Three of 15 patients with Dukes' B and C disease progressed at 19, 24, and 35 months. Seven of eight patients with completely resected Dukes' D disease remained on study from 12 to 33 months; one patient with resected Dukes' D disease relapsed at 9 months. One patient with incompletely resected Dukes' D disease remained on study at 14 months without evidence of progression; eight experienced disease progression at 6 to 31 months. CONCLUSION:CeaVac consistently generated a potent anti-CEA humoral and cellular immune response in all 32 patients entered onto this trial. A number of very high-risk patients continue on study. 5-FU regimens, which are the standard of care for patients with Dukes' C disease, did not affect the immune response. These data warrant a phase III trial for patients with resected colon cancer.
Authors: Bianca Ferrarini Zanetti; Camila Pontes Ferreira; José Ronnie Carvalho de Vasconcelos; Sang Won Han Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Maria R Parkhurst; James C Yang; Russell C Langan; Mark E Dudley; Debbie-Ann N Nathan; Steven A Feldman; Jeremy L Davis; Richard A Morgan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Sherry; Marybeth S Hughes; Udai S Kammula; Giao Q Phan; Ramona M Lim; Stephen A Wank; Nicholas P Restifo; Paul F Robbins; Carolyn M Laurencot; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Philip M Arlen; James L Gulley; Catherine Parker; Lisa Skarupa; Mary Pazdur; Dennis Panicali; Patricia Beetham; Kwong Y Tsang; Douglas W Grosenbach; Jarett Feldman; Seth M Steinberg; Elizabeth Jones; Clara Chen; Jennifer Marte; Jeffrey Schlom; William Dahut Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maria R Parkhurst; Jayne Joo; John P Riley; Zhiya Yu; Yong Li; Paul F Robbins; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y A Aldhamen; S S Seregin; Y A Kousa; D P W Rastall; D M Appledorn; S Godbehere; B C Schutte; A Amalfitano Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Ana M Vázquez; Ana M Hernández; Amparo Macías; Enrique Montero; Daniel E Gómez; Daniel F Alonso; Mariano R Gabri; Roberto E Gómez Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 6.244