Literature DB >> 10561329

Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice.

J S Mandelblatt1, P A Ganz, K L Kahn.   

Abstract

Cancer is an important disease, and health care services have the potential to improve the quality and quantity of life for cancer patients. The delivery of these services also has recently been well codified. Given this framework, cancer care presents a unique opportunity for clinicians to develop and test outcome measures across diverse practice settings. Recently, the Institute of Medicine released a report reviewing the quality of cancer care in the United States and called for further development and monitoring of quality indicators. Thus, as we move into the 21st century, professional and regulatory agencies will be seeking to expand process measures and develop and validate outcomes-oriented measures for cancer and other diseases. For such measures to be clinically relevant and feasible, it is key that the oncology community take an active leadership role in this process. To set the stage for such activities, this article first reviews broad methodologic concerns involved in selecting measures of the quality of care, using breast cancer to exemplify key issues. We then use the case of breast cancer to review the different phases of cancer care and provide examples of phase-specific measures that, after careful operationalization, testing, and validation, could be used as the basis of an agenda for measuring the quality of breast cancer care in oncology practice. The diffusion of process and outcome measures into practice; the practicality, reliability, and validity of these measures; and the impact that these indicators have on practice patterns and the health of populations will be key to evaluating the success of such quality-of-care paradigms. Ultimately, improved quality of care should translate into morbidity and mortality reductions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561329     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Lynn Lethbridge; Ron Dewar; Beverley Lawson; Lawrence F Paszat; Grace Johnston; Frederick Burge; Paul McIntyre; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling; S M Evans; P McLaughlin; M Senthuren; J Millar; J Gooi; L Irving; P Mitchell; A Haydon; J Ruben; M Conron; T Leong; N Watkins; J J McNeil
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Anne-Marie Meyer; Amy P Abernethy; Til Stürmer; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Meyer; William R Carpenter; Amy P Abernethy; Til Stürmer; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Constructs of burden of illness in older patients with breast cancer: a comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; A S Bierman; K Gold; Y Zhang; J H Ng; N Maserejian; N Maserejan; Y T Hwang; N J Meropol; J Hadley; R A Silliman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Predictors and outcomes of surgeons' referral of older breast cancer patients to medical oncologists.

Authors:  Soe Soe Thwin; Aliza K Fink; Timothy L Lash; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The population-based oncological health care study OVIS - recruitment of the patients and analysis of the non-participants.

Authors:  Ron Pritzkuleit; Annika Waldmann; Heiner Raspe; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.