Literature DB >> 10561272

High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection.

M Engelhardt1, H Bertz, M Afting, C F Waller, J Finke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a high- versus a standard-dose filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or rhG-CSF) regimen to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation was investigated in 75 healthy donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 to December 1997, 75 consecutive donors (median age, 38 years; range, 17 to 67 years) were assigned to two different schedules of rhG-CSF for PBPC mobilization. Fifty donors received 24 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (BW) divided into two daily subcutaneous injections (two doses of 12 microg, group A), whereas 25 were treated with 10 microg rhG-CSF once daily (group B). Apheresis was started on day 4 in group A and on day 5 in group B. Target CD34(+) cell numbers in apheresis products were >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW.
RESULTS: Cytokine priming and collection of PBPCs were equally well tolerated in both groups. Significantly higher CD34(+) cell numbers in group A with 3. 7 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.47 x 10(6)/L apheresis) compared with 2 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.25 x 10(6)/L apharesis) in group B were obtained (P <.05). Using standard aphereses (median, 9 L), two doses of 12 microg rhG-CSF/kg allowed collection of >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells with two aphereses (range, one to three) in group A versus three aphereses (range, one to six) in group B (P <.015). Donor age, sex, and BW influenced the collection of CD34(+) cell numbers: in particular, significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 40 years compared with donors older than 40 years of age (P <.05). In 65 CD34(+) selection procedures using avidin-biotin immunoabsorption columns (Ceprate SC System, CellPro, Bothell, WA), a median CD34(+) purity of 53%, CD34(+) recovery of 40%, and the collection of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells/selection were achieved. In group A with higher CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis, CD34(+) purity, recovery, and cell yields were 60%, 45%, and 2.3 x 10(6)/kg/selection, respectively, as compared with 48%, 31%, and 0.7 x 10(6)/kg in group B (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that twice daily rhG-CSF (two doses of 12 microg/kg BM) compared with once daily rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg BW), in addition to being well tolerated, significantly improves PBPC mobilization, allows the collection of higher numbers of CD34(+) cells with one or two standard aphereses, and facilitates subsequent selection procedures in healthy allogeneic donors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561272     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

Review 1.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  G-CSF in Healthy Allogeneic Stem Cell Donors.

Authors:  Kristina Hölig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 3.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Feasibility and cost analysis of day 4 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell collection from HLA-matched sibling donors.

Authors:  Laura F Newell; Kelsea M Shoop; Rebekah J Knight; Sara N Murray; Rogelyn P Kwock; Carol E Jacoby; Susan Slater; Bryon E Allen; Casondra Ottowa; Brad Cota; Peggy L Appel; Rachel J Cook; Richard T Maziarz; Gabrielle Meyers
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.414

5.  Stem cell collection in unmanipulated HLA-haploidentical/mismatched related transplantation with combined granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-mobilised blood and bone marrow for patients with haematologic malignancies: the impact of donor characteristics and procedural settings.

Authors:  C Zhang; X-H Chen; X Zhang; L Gao; L Gao; P-Y Kong; X-G Peng; A-H Sun; Y Gong; D-F Zeng; Q-Y Wang
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.019

6.  Donor demographic and laboratory predictors of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Sumithira Vasu; Susan F Leitman; John F Tisdale; Matthew M Hsieh; Richard W Childs; A John Barrett; Daniel H Fowler; Michael R Bishop; Elizabeth M Kang; Harry L Malech; Cynthia E Dunbar; Hanh M Khuu; Robert Wesley; Yu Y Yau; Charles D Bolan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on bone metabolism during peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Tsutomu Watanabe; Hiroko Suzuya; Toshihiro Onishi; Sachiyo Kanai; Michiya Kaneko; Hiroyoshi Watanabe; Ryuji Nakagawa; Yoshifumi Kawano; Yoichi Takaue; Yasuhiro Kuroda; James E Talmadge
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Change in erythropoietin pharmacokinetics following hematopoietic transplantation.

Authors:  J A Widness; R L Schmidt; R J Hohl; F D Goldman; N H Al-Huniti; K J Freise; P Veng-Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; S Chia; S Verma; D Robson; C Desbiens; C Cripps; J Mikhael
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 10.  Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hillard M Lazarus; Parastoo B Dahi; Scott Avecilla; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.