PURPOSE: To evaluate the specificity of the HercepTest for Immunoenzymatic Staining (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) for determining HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight invasive breast cancers previously found to be HER-2/neu-negative by two different immunohistochemical (IHC) assays and not amplified for the HER-2/neu gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization were studied using the HercepTest kit. HercepTest was performed according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and the results were scored on a 0 to 3+ scale using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved grading system. In this system, cases scored as 2+ or 3+ are considered HER-2/neu-positive. RESULTS: Among these 48 cases, the IHC score using the FDA-approved scoring system was 0 in four cases (8.3%), 1+ in 16 (33.3%), 2+ in 21 (43.8%), and 3+ in seven (14.6%). Therefore, 58.4% of these cases were categorized as HER-2/neu-positive, and the specificity of the HercepTest kit for HER-2/neu expression was 41.6%. However, with the use of a modified scoring system that took into account the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium, the specificity increased to 93.2%. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the HercepTest kit, when used in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines and the FDA-approved scoring system, results in a large proportion of breast cancers being categorized as positive for HER-2/neu protein expression and that many of these seem to be false-positives. Consideration of the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium resulted in improved specificity. The current FDA-approved scoring system for HercepTest results should be reevaluated before its widespread use in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the specificity of the HercepTest for Immunoenzymatic Staining (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) for determining HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight invasive breast cancers previously found to be HER-2/neu-negative by two different immunohistochemical (IHC) assays and not amplified for the HER-2/neu gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization were studied using the HercepTest kit. HercepTest was performed according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and the results were scored on a 0 to 3+ scale using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved grading system. In this system, cases scored as 2+ or 3+ are considered HER-2/neu-positive. RESULTS: Among these 48 cases, the IHC score using the FDA-approved scoring system was 0 in four cases (8.3%), 1+ in 16 (33.3%), 2+ in 21 (43.8%), and 3+ in seven (14.6%). Therefore, 58.4% of these cases were categorized as HER-2/neu-positive, and the specificity of the HercepTest kit for HER-2/neu expression was 41.6%. However, with the use of a modified scoring system that took into account the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium, the specificity increased to 93.2%. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the HercepTest kit, when used in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines and the FDA-approved scoring system, results in a large proportion of breast cancers being categorized as positive for HER-2/neu protein expression and that many of these seem to be false-positives. Consideration of the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium resulted in improved specificity. The current FDA-approved scoring system for HercepTest results should be reevaluated before its widespread use in clinical practice.
Authors: Benjamin T Spike; Dannielle D Engle; Jennifer C Lin; Samantha K Cheung; Justin La; Geoffrey M Wahl Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Jennifer Bordeaux; Allison Welsh; Seema Agarwal; Elizabeth Killiam; Maria Baquero; Jason Hanna; Valsamo Anagnostou; David Rimm Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: Angelo Di Leo; Henry L Gomez; Zeba Aziz; Zanete Zvirbule; Jose Bines; Michael C Arbushites; Stephanie F Guerrera; Maria Koehler; Cristina Oliva; Steven H Stein; Lisa S Williams; Judy Dering; Richard S Finn; Michael F Press Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brad A Kairdolf; Andrew M Smith; Todd H Stokes; May D Wang; Andrew N Young; Shuming Nie Journal: Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif) Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 10.745