Literature DB >> 10561248

Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring system.

T W Jacobs1, A M Gown, H Yaziji, M J Barnes, S J Schnitt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the specificity of the HercepTest for Immunoenzymatic Staining (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) for determining HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight invasive breast cancers previously found to be HER-2/neu-negative by two different immunohistochemical (IHC) assays and not amplified for the HER-2/neu gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization were studied using the HercepTest kit. HercepTest was performed according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and the results were scored on a 0 to 3+ scale using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved grading system. In this system, cases scored as 2+ or 3+ are considered HER-2/neu-positive.
RESULTS: Among these 48 cases, the IHC score using the FDA-approved scoring system was 0 in four cases (8.3%), 1+ in 16 (33.3%), 2+ in 21 (43.8%), and 3+ in seven (14.6%). Therefore, 58.4% of these cases were categorized as HER-2/neu-positive, and the specificity of the HercepTest kit for HER-2/neu expression was 41.6%. However, with the use of a modified scoring system that took into account the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium, the specificity increased to 93.2%.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the HercepTest kit, when used in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines and the FDA-approved scoring system, results in a large proportion of breast cancers being categorized as positive for HER-2/neu protein expression and that many of these seem to be false-positives. Consideration of the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium resulted in improved specificity. The current FDA-approved scoring system for HercepTest results should be reevaluated before its widespread use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561248     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  91 in total

1.  Concomitant oncoprotein detection with fluorescence in situ hybridization (CODFISH): a fluorescence-based assay enabling simultaneous visualization of gene amplification and encoded protein expression.

Authors:  R R Tubbs; J Pettay; P Roche; M H Stoler; R Jenkins; J Myles; T Grogan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Laser capture microdissection: beyond functional genomics to proteomics.

Authors:  N L Simone; C P Paweletz; L Charboneau; E F Petricoin; L A Liotta
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-12

3.  A mammary stem cell population identified and characterized in late embryogenesis reveals similarities to human breast cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin T Spike; Dannielle D Engle; Jennifer C Lin; Samantha K Cheung; Justin La; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  The TNM classification of breast cancer: need for change.

Authors:  Paolo Arnone; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Silvia Dellapasqua; Emilia Montagna; Paola Arnaboldi; Mattia Intra; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-10

5.  Cytoplasmic expression of c-erbB2 in non-small cell lung cancers.

Authors:  Chun-Mei Cheng; Koichi Tsuneyama; Kazuhiro Matsui; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Shin Ishizawa; Yasuo Takano
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  ER, PgR, HER-2, Ki-67, topoisomerase IIα, and nm23-H1 proteins expression as predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi-ru Li; Mei Liu; Yan-jun Zhang; Jian-dong Wang; Yi-qiong Zheng; Jie Li; Bing Ma; Xin Song
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Antibody validation.

Authors:  Jennifer Bordeaux; Allison Welsh; Seema Agarwal; Elizabeth Killiam; Maria Baquero; Jason Hanna; Valsamo Anagnostou; David Rimm
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.993

8.  Phase III, double-blind, randomized study comparing lapatinib plus paclitaxel with placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelo Di Leo; Henry L Gomez; Zeba Aziz; Zanete Zvirbule; Jose Bines; Michael C Arbushites; Stephanie F Guerrera; Maria Koehler; Cristina Oliva; Steven H Stein; Lisa S Williams; Judy Dering; Richard S Finn; Michael F Press
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 expression in breast carcinomas: comparison of cell block and tissue block preparations.

Authors:  Sharenda L Williams; George G Birdsong; Cynthia Cohen; Momin T Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-20

Review 10.  Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications.

Authors:  Brad A Kairdolf; Andrew M Smith; Todd H Stokes; May D Wang; Andrew N Young; Shuming Nie
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 10.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.