Literature DB >> 10561235

Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire.

D A Loblaw1, A Bezjak, T Bunston.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a psychometrically sound patient-satisfaction-with-physician questionnaire that can be used in an outpatient oncology setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was developed by a four-step process involving a total of 277 cancer patients. The item-generation process utilized input from 95 oncology outpatients, three medical researchers, and the relevant literature. Items were tested by 70 of the above patients. Initial item reduction was achieved by input from another eight patients. Factor analysis and validity testing used data derived from a different group of 174 oncology outpatients. Convergent validity was tested by correlating the Princess Margaret Hospital Patient Satisfaction with Doctor Questionnaire (PMH/PSQ-MD) with Rubin et al's Physician subscale of the Patient's Viewpoint Questionnaire (PS-PVQ) and Smith et al's Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale (PDIS). Divergent validity was tested by comparing these questionnaires with Spitzer's quality of life (QOL) questionnaire.
RESULTS: The final PMH/PSQ-MD is a 29-item self-administered questionnaire with four response categories and a "does not apply" category. Four domains were confirmed by factor analysis: (1) information exchange, (2) interpersonal skills, (3) empathy, and (4) quality of time. The questionnaire has an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.97; the values for each domain are, respectively, 0.92, 0.90, 0. 88, and 0.88. The PMH/PSQ-MD correlated well with both the PDIS and the PS-PVQ (P <.001 for both). Divergent validity was confirmed with Spitzer's QOL questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: The PMH/PSQ-MD is an outpatient satisfaction questionnaire specific to the patient-physician interaction that has shown excellent internal consistency, is feasible, and has strong support for validity in this oncology population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561235     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Psychological effects and mediators of a group multi-component program for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Greg Heard; Karen L Cavanagh
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-05-26

2.  Assessment of general public satisfaction with public healthcare services in Kedah, Malaysia.

Authors:  Mohammed Azmi Hassali; Alian A Alrasheedy; Basyirah Afifah Ab Razak; Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi; Fahad Saleem; Noman Ul Haq; Hisham Aljadhey
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-01-31

3.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Patient satisfaction with service quality as a predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Mark Rodeghier; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

Authors:  S Grogan; M Conner; P Norman; D Willits; I Porter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

6.  The cancer outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire for chemotherapy, OUT-PATSAT35 CT: a validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Jose Juan Illarramendi; Antonio Viudez; Maria Jose Lecumberri; Susana de la Cruz; Berta Hernandez; Uxue Zarandona; Anne Bredart; Maite Martinez; Esteban Salgado; Nuria Lainez; Ruth Vera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire: EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ruth Vera; Maite Martínez; Berta Hernández; Nuria Laínez; Mikel Rico; Meritxell Vila; Volker Chicata; Gemma Asín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients.

Authors:  Benjamin D Diplock; Kaitlin M C McGarragle; Willem A Mueller; Sana Haddad; Rachel Ehrlich; Dong-Hyun A Yoon; Xingshan Cao; Yaseen Al-Allaq; Paul Karanicolas; Margaret I Fitch; Jeff Myers; Alex J Mitchell; Janet W M Ellis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Does tumor status influence cancer patients' satisfaction with the doctor-patient interaction?

Authors:  Richard Bitar; Andrea Bezjak; Kenneth Mah; D Andrew Loblaw; Andrew P Gotowiec; Gerald M Devins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation.

Authors:  Craig Locatis; Deborah Williamson; Carrie Gould-Kabler; Laurie Zone-Smith; Isabel Detzler; Jason Roberson; Richard Maisiak; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.