S C Tang1, N Shehata, G Chernenko, M Khalifa, X Wang, N Shaheta. 1. Department of Medicine , Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, and Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, Canada. stang@nctrf.nf.ca
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the expression of BAG-1 in invasive breast carcinomas. The intensity and subcellular distribution of BAG-1 expression was correlated with conventional prognostic factors and with disease-free and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in St. John's, Newfoundland, between 1986 and 1996 were included in the study. The median follow-up of the study was 8 years. Expression of BAG-1 was determined by immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissues. RESULTS: Of the 140 breast carcinomas examined, 77.1% were positive for BAG-1 expression. Except for differentiation, no correlation was observed between BAG-1 expression and conventional prognostic factors such as age, histology, stage, and estrogen and progesterone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, BAG-1 expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free (P =.0052) and overall survival (P =.0033). Patients whose tumors expressed nuclear BAG-1 tended to have a shorter disease-free (63 v 84 months; P = 0.4493) and overall (69 v 99 months, P =.1009) survival. CONCLUSION: BAG-1 is overexpressed in the majority of invasive breast carcinomas. Although BAG-1 did not correlate with conventional prognostic factors, its overexpression, especially the nuclear expression, may be associated with a shorter disease-free and overall survival. Our preliminary data strongly indicate that further investigation is warranted to define the role of BAG-1 as an independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the expression of BAG-1 in invasive breast carcinomas. The intensity and subcellular distribution of BAG-1 expression was correlated with conventional prognostic factors and with disease-free and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in St. John's, Newfoundland, between 1986 and 1996 were included in the study. The median follow-up of the study was 8 years. Expression of BAG-1 was determined by immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissues. RESULTS: Of the 140 breast carcinomas examined, 77.1% were positive for BAG-1 expression. Except for differentiation, no correlation was observed between BAG-1 expression and conventional prognostic factors such as age, histology, stage, and estrogen and progesterone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, BAG-1 expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free (P =.0052) and overall survival (P =.0033). Patients whose tumors expressed nuclear BAG-1 tended to have a shorter disease-free (63 v 84 months; P = 0.4493) and overall (69 v 99 months, P =.1009) survival. CONCLUSION:BAG-1 is overexpressed in the majority of invasive breast carcinomas. Although BAG-1 did not correlate with conventional prognostic factors, its overexpression, especially the nuclear expression, may be associated with a shorter disease-free and overall survival. Our preliminary data strongly indicate that further investigation is warranted to define the role of BAG-1 as an independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Authors: Stefania Staibano; Massimo Mascolo; Maria Di Benedetto; Maria Luisa Vecchione; Gennaro Ilardi; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Riccardo Autorino; Vincenzo Salerno; Antonella Morena; Alba Rocco; Maria Caterina Turco; Emilio Morelli Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2010-06-10
Authors: E K A Millar; L R Anderson; C M McNeil; S A O'Toole; M Pinese; P Crea; A L Morey; A V Biankin; S M Henshall; E A Musgrove; R L Sutherland; A J Butt Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: H C Dobbyn; K Hill; T L Hamilton; K A Spriggs; B M Pickering; M J Coldwell; C H de Moor; M Bushell; A E Willis Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-08-13 Impact factor: 9.867