Literature DB >> 10561204

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: effect on diagnosis and outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

B Fowble1, A Hanlon, G Freedman, A Patchefsky, H Kessler, N Nicolaou, J Hoffman, E Sigurdson, M Boraas, L Goldstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the pretreatment characteristics and outcome of postmenopausal women with stage I-II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation who had a history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with those who had never received HRT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1979 to 1993, 485 postmenopausal women underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation for stage I-II breast cancer. The median follow-up was 5.9 years. One hundred forty-one patients reported a history of HRT. The median length of use was 5 years. Three hundred forty-four patients reported no history of HRT.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed for median age (HRT 60 years v no HRT 64 years; P =.0009), median weight (HRT 142 lbs v no HRT 152 lbs; P =.004), clinical tumor size < or = 2 cm (HRT 77% v no HRT 66%; P =.02), and the use of re-excision (HRT 62% v no HRT 49%; P =.01). The method of detection by mammogram only (HRT 52% v no HRT 42%; P =.06) was of borderline statistical significance. The HRT patients had a statistically significant increased cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (8% v 2%; P =.02), a statistically significant decreased cumulative incidence of distant metastases (HRT 6% v no HRT 17%; P =.01), and a borderline statistically significant improvement in cause-specific survival at 10 years (HRT 92% v no HRT 86%; P =.07). Postmenopausal women with a history of HRT did not have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast cancer malignancy.
CONCLUSION: This study failed to identify an adverse effect of HRT on breast cancer mortality in patients with stage I-II disease treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561204     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

Review 1.  How to judge the association of postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ling Xu
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-08-05

2.  Hormone Therapy and its Effect on the Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C Rauh; F Schuetz; B Rack; E Stickeler; M Klar; M Orlowska-Volk; M Windfuhr-Blum; J Heil; J Rom; C Sohn; U Andergassen; J Jueckstock; T Fehm; C R Loehberg; A Hein; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; W Janni; P A Fasching; L Häberle
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lena U Rosenberg; Fredrik Granath; Paul W Dickman; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Sara Wedrén; Ingemar Persson; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 4.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: a clinician's message for patients.

Authors:  Leon Speroff
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.925

5.  Is breast cancer prognosis inherited?

Authors:  Mikael Hartman; Linda Lindström; Paul W Dickman; Hans-Olov Adami; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.