Literature DB >> 10561135

Effect of intensive blood pressure control on the course of type 1 diabetic nephropathy. Collaborative Study Group.

J B Lewis1, T Berl, R P Bain, R D Rohde, E J Lewis.   

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States. We undertook a study to assess the impact of assignment to different levels of blood pressure control on the course of type 1 diabetic nephropathy in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. We also examined the long-term course of this well-characterized cohort of patients receiving ACE inhibitor therapy. One hundred twenty-nine patients with type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy who had previously participated in the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Diabetic Nephropathy Study who had a serum creatinine level less than 4.0 mg/dL were randomly assigned to a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) goal of 92 mm Hg or less (group I) or 100 to 107 mm Hg (group II). Patients received varying doses of ramipril as the primary therapeutic antihypertensive agent. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Outcome measures included iothalamate clearance, 24-hour creatinine clearance, creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula, and urinary protein excretion. The average difference in MAP between groups was 6 mm Hg over the 24-month follow-up. The median iothalamate clearance in group I was 62 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline and 54 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at the end of the study compared with a baseline of 64 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and final 58 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in group II. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of decline in renal function between groups. There was a significant difference in follow-up total urinary protein excretion between group I (535 mg/24 h) and group II (1,723 mg/24 h; P = 0.02). Thirty-two percent of 126 patients achieved a final total protein excretion less than 500 mg/24 h. Patients from groups I and II had equivalent rates of adverse events. In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy, the MAP goal should be 92 mm Hg or less for optimal renoprotection, if defined as including decreased proteinuria. With the combination of ACE inhibition and intensive blood pressure control, many patients can achieve regression or apparent remission of clinical evidence of diabetic nephropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561135     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70036-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  36 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Claudia van Dijk; Tomas Berl
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Quinapril: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  Christine R Culy; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Integrating albuminuria and GFR in the assessment of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  George Jerums; Sianna Panagiotopoulos; Erosha Premaratne; Richard J MacIsaac
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 5.  Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2016.

Authors:  Masakazu Haneda; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hideki Origasa; Hiroshi Noto; Daisuke Yabe; Yukihiro Fujita; Atsushi Goto; Tatsuya Kondo; Eiichi Araki
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2018-03-27

6.  BP and Renal Outcomes in Diabetic Kidney Disease: The Veterans Affairs Nephropathy in Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  David J Leehey; Jane H Zhang; Nicholas V Emanuele; Adam Whaley-Connell; Paul M Palevsky; Robert F Reilly; Peter Guarino; Linda F Fried
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Time-updated systolic blood pressure and the progression of chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda H Anderson; Wei Yang; Raymond R Townsend; Qiang Pan; Glenn M Chertow; John W Kusek; Jeanne Charleston; Jiang He; RadhaKrishna Kallem; James P Lash; Edgar R Miller; Mahboob Rahman; Susan Steigerwalt; Matthew Weir; Jackson T Wright; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Cost effectiveness of ramipril in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy and hypertension: economic evaluation of Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy (REIN) Study for Germany from the perspective of statutory health insurance.

Authors:  P K Schädlich; J G Brecht; M Brunetti; E Pagano; B Rangoonwala; E Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Appropriate drug therapy for improving outcomes in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Robert D Toto
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Addition of angiotensin receptor blockade or mineralocorticoid antagonism to maximal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Uzma F Mehdi; Beverley Adams-Huet; Philip Raskin; Gloria L Vega; Robert D Toto
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.