Literature DB >> 10559625

Management of symptomatic BPH in the US: who is treated and how?

R Bruskewitz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in North America.
METHODS: Information was obtained from published scientific articles, lay press articles, Medicare outcomes data, IMS market analysis data and surveys among primary care practitioners and urologists.
RESULTS: A survey in Olmsted County in the US identified the number of men with an I-PSS score >7 and maximum urinary flow rate <15 ml/s. This survey found that 17% of men in the 50-59 year old age bracket, 27% of men in the 60-69 bracket and 37% of men in the 70-79 bracket meet this minimum criterion for discussions about treatment. Currently in the US, there are approximately 5.6 million men that fall in this category, and the number is expected to double by the year 2025. Primary care physicians in 25% of cases and internal medicine in 24% of cases provide initial management of BPH. Urologists provide initial management in 37% of cases. Improvement in urinary symptoms and quality of life is the most important health outcome in the management of symptomatic BPH in the US, particularly because serious complications from BPH are distinctly uncommon. A survey among urologists determined that for men with mild symptoms, watchful waiting was employed 77% of the time, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists 21% and finasteride 1%. For those with moderate symptoms and prostate volume </=40 ml, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are employed 88% of the time, finasteride 1% and TURP 1%. When the prostate is in excess of 40 ml, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are used 69% of the time, finasteride 10% and TURP 9%. alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists are also employed most of the time for patients with severe symptoms: 58% of the time for small and 45% of the time for large prostates. The respective data for TURP are 31% and 38%. Primary care physicians utilize predominantly watchful waiting and long-acting alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. Laser use in the management of BPH has fallen from 40% of urologists in 1994 to 26% in 1997. TUMT and TUNA are each employed by 3% of urologists. The use of transurethral vaporisation of the prostate has increased to 62% of urologists. For those patients being treated with medication, 36% are treated with terazosin, 31% with doxazosin, 15% with finasteride and 18% with tamsulosin, which was introduced only recently and is growing.
CONCLUSIONS: In the future, the number of older men in the US will increase dramatically. Likely the percentage of patients undergoing surgical treatment such as TURP will decrease but the absolute number having surgery will increase. It is also likely that alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists will be used with greater frequency in the future and finasteride will be used less frequently. Copyrightz1999S.KargerAG,Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10559625     DOI: 10.1159/000052343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  18 in total

Review 1.  Phytotherapeutic agents in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  K Dreikorn
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Changes in medicare reimbursement: impact on therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Robert F Donnell
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Lower urinary tract disease: what are we trying to treat and in whom?

Authors:  Jeremy P W Heaton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  From open simple to robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for large benign prostate hyperplasia: the time has come.

Authors:  H John; Ch Wagner; Ch Padevit; J H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Tamsulosin: an update of its role in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Blair Jarvis; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Tamsulosin: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Christopher J Dunn; Anna Matheson; Diana M Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Stephen S Connolly; John M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  A comprehensive approach toward novel serum biomarkers for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the MPSA Consortium.

Authors:  Chris Mullins; M Scott Lucia; Simon W Hayward; Jeannette Y Lee; Jonathan M Levitt; Victor K Lin; Brian C-S Liu; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin; Kevin Slawin; Robert A Star; Robert H Getzenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Trends in Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Joseph J Pariser; Vignesh T Packiam; Melanie A Adamsky; Gregory T Bales
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  The value of appropriate assessment prior to specialist referral in men with prostatic symptoms.

Authors:  M R Quinlan; B J O'Daly; M F O'Brien; S Gardner; G Lennon; D W Mulvin; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.