Literature DB >> 10559394

Functional properties of channels formed by the neuronal gap junction protein connexin36.

M Srinivas1, R Rozental, T Kojima, R Dermietzel, M Mehler, D F Condorelli, J A Kessler, D C Spray.   

Abstract

The expression and functional properties of connexin36 (Cx36) were examined in two communication-deficient cell lines (N2A-neuroblastoma and PC-12 cells) transfected with Cx36 and in hippocampal neurons that express the connexin endogenously. Transfected cells expressed the expected 2.9 kb Cx36 transcript and Cx36 immunoreactivity, whereas nontransfected cells were devoid of Cx36. The relationship between steady-state junctional conductance (g(j)) and transjunctional voltage was well described by a two-state Boltzmann equation. The half-inactivation voltage (V(0)), the ratio of minimal to maximal g(j) (g(min)/g(max)), and the equivalent gating charge were +/- 75 mV, 0.55, and 1.75, respectively, indicating that Cx36 exhibits very low voltage sensitivity. Conductance of single Cx36 channels measured with patch pipettes containing 130 mM CsCl was 10-15 pS (n = 15 cell pairs); despite this low unitary conductance, Cx36 channels were permeable to the dye Lucifer yellow. Hippocampal neurons expressed Cx36 both in vivo and in culture. The electrophysiological properties of channels in cultured hippocampal neurons were similar to those of the channels expressed by the transfected cell lines, and the neuronal channels were similarly permeable to Lucifer yellow. The unique combination of weak voltage sensitivity, small unitary conductance, and permeation by anions as large as second messenger molecules endows Cx36 gap junction channels with properties well suited for mediating flexible electrical and biochemical interactions between neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10559394      PMCID: PMC6782942     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

Review 1.  Gap junctions in the brain: where, what type, how many and why?

Authors:  R Dermietzel; D C Spray
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Developmentally regulated spontaneous activity in the embryonic chick retina.

Authors:  W T Wong; J R Sanes; R O Wong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Coordination of neuronal activity in developing visual cortex by gap junction-mediated biochemical communication.

Authors:  K Kandler; L C Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Electrotonic coupling between neurons in cat inferior olive.

Authors:  R Llinas; R Baker; C Sotelo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Electrotonic coupling between pyramidal cells: a direct demonstration in rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  B A MacVicar; F E Dudek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Synchronized bursting of CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells in the absence of synaptic transmission.

Authors:  J G Jefferys; H L Haas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dye coupling and possible electrotonic coupling in the guinea pig neocortical slice.

Authors:  M J Gutnick; D A Prince
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Rat hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture.

Authors:  G A Banker; W M Cowan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-05-13       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein.

Authors:  K E Reed; E M Westphale; D M Larson; H Z Wang; R D Veenstra; E C Beyer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Gap junction channels: distinct voltage-sensitive and -insensitive conductance states.

Authors:  A P Moreno; M B Rook; G I Fishman; D C Spray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  87 in total

1.  Rhythmic coupling among cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  C S Colwell
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2000-06-15

2.  A series of biotinylated tracers distinguishes three types of gap junction in retina.

Authors:  S L Mills; S C Massey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Function of the voltage gate of gap junction channels: selective exclusion of molecules.

Authors:  Yang Qu; Gerhard Dahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quinine blocks specific gap junction channel subtypes.

Authors:  M Srinivas; M G Hopperstad; D C Spray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of amino terminus of mouse Cx50 in determining transjunctional voltage-dependent gating and unitary conductance.

Authors:  Li Xin; Xiang-Qun Gong; Donglin Bai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Functional expression of the murine connexin 36 gene coding for a neuron-specific gap junctional protein.

Authors:  B Teubner; J Degen; G Söhl; M Güldenagel; F F Bukauskas; E B Trexler; V K Verselis; C I De Zeeuw; C G Lee; C A Kozak; E Petrasch-Parwez; R Dermietzel; K Willecke
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Aspartic acid residue D3 critically determines Cx50 gap junction channel transjunctional voltage-dependent gating and unitary conductance.

Authors:  Li Xin; So Nakagawa; Tomitake Tsukihara; Donglin Bai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Cerebrospinal Fluid-Contacting Neurons Sense pH Changes and Motion in the Hypothalamus.

Authors:  Elham Jalalvand; Brita Robertson; Hervé Tostivint; Peter Löw; Peter Wallén; Sten Grillner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Screening of gap junction antagonists on dye coupling in the rabbit retina.

Authors:  Feng Pan; Stephen L Mills; Stephen C Massey
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Pore-lining residues identified by single channel SCAM studies in Cx46 hemichannels.

Authors:  J Kronengold; E B Trexler; F F Bukauskas; T A Bargiello; V K Verselis
Journal:  Cell Commun Adhes       Date:  2003 Jul-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.