Literature DB >> 10557664

Left in limbo: patients' views on care across the primary/secondary interface.

C Preston1, F Cheater, R Baker, H Hearnshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover the views of patients about their experiences across the interface between primary and secondary health care, including referral from general practitioners, outpatient and inpatient care, discharge, and aftercare.
DESIGN: A qualitative study involving individual and focus group interviews of patients and interviews of carers.
SUBJECTS: 33 patients who had attended at least one outpatient appointment or had been an inpatient between two and four months previously, and eight carers of patients with chronic conditions.
SETTING: Three acute hospitals and one community health service in Leicestershire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Common themes in the views of patients and carers towards their experiences of care.
RESULTS: Five themes emerged. The first four were: "getting in" (access to appropriate care), "fitting in" (orientation of care to the patient's requirements), "knowing what's going on" (provision of information), and "continuity" (continuity of staff and coordination and communication among professionals). The fifth theme was "limbo" (difficulty in making progress through the system), which was influenced by failures in care in relation to the other four themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of progress is central to patients' views of care. It involves both progress through the healthcare system and progress towards recovery or adjustment to an altered health state. Patients' views on how well they progress through the healthcare system may be an appropriate indicator for monitoring health service performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10557664      PMCID: PMC2483626          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  10 in total

1.  Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12

Review 2.  The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J E Ware; A Davies-Avery; A L Stewart
Journal:  Health Med Care Serv Rev       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore.

Authors:  L Aharony; S Strasser
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

4.  Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  M Avis; M Bond; A Arthur
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Keeping the customer satisfied: issues in the interpretation and use of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  A Scott; R D Smith
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 8.  Enriching the doctor-patient relationship by inviting the patient's perspective.

Authors:  T L Delbanco
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  National survey of hospital patients.

Authors:  S Bruster; B Jarman; N Bosanquet; D Weston; R Erens; T L Delbanco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-10

Review 10.  Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis.

Authors:  M Wensing; R Grol; A Smits
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total
  43 in total

1.  Outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy. Larger and more robust studies are needed.

Authors:  J C Hardwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

2.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality.

Authors:  C Pope; P van Royen; R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 3.  Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Rosamond Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The White Paper: what the College wants.

Authors:  Mayur Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Good general practitioners will continue to be essential.

Authors:  Mayur Lakhani; Maureen Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-07

6.  In a unique position or squeezed out? The professional roles of general practitioners in cancer care in general and of young adult cancer patients in particular.

Authors:  Bibi Hølge-Hazelton; Inge Christensen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Making primary care placements a universal feature of postgraduate medical training.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid; Nishma Manek
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Quality of communication between primary health care and mental health care: an examination of referral and discharge letters.

Authors:  Janet Durbin; Jan Barnsley; Brenda Finlayson; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Elizabeth Lin; Whitney Berta; Josephine McMurray
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cultural diversity between hospital and community nurses: implications for continuity of care.

Authors:  Ragnhild Hellesø; May Solveig Fagermoen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.