Literature DB >> 10557505

Measuring worksite resources for employee heart health.

B Fisher1, T Golaszewski, D Barr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intervention at the organizational rather than the individual level is gaining greater attention in worksite health promotion efforts. However, little research has been done on instruments to measure this domain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to further test the utility of an existing organizational heart health support instrument by examining relationships among worksite structural characteristics and comparing these results to other survey findings.
DESIGN: One-time cross-sectional.
SETTING: New York State.
SUBJECTS: One hundred fifteen volunteer worksites in the New York State Healthy Heart Program, representing manufacturing, government, education, health care, and other industries. MEASURES: A survey was conducted using HeartCheck, an organizational assessment of employee support for heart health. HeartCheck contains 175 items measuring organizational support for tobacco control, nutrition, physical activity, stress, screening, and administrative support structure.
RESULTS: On average, only 22% of all worksite resources assessed were present in the sample. Having a workforce greater than 250 provided a 12% increase in predicted overall worksite resources. A predominantly female workforce (> 75%) provided 10% higher levels of worksite stress resources. Worksites with unions had higher levels of resources for physical activity (10%), screening (13%), and general supportive structures (10%). The presence of manual labor diminished support for tobacco control resources (-13%). Finally, manufacturing worksites demonstrated a clear advantage for all types of worksite resources, except for stress.
CONCLUSION: A number of trends found in this study are consistent with earlier work. Industry type and size both predict worksite supports similar to previous studies. Other findings that appear to contradict previous work, including the relatively low level of support observed in this sample, can be explained by the comprehensive nature of the instrument. Overall, these findings demonstrate the utility of HeartCheck.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10557505     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.6.325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  5 in total

1.  Health promotion site selection blues: barriers to participation and implementation.

Authors:  Martin Cherniack; Tim Morse; Robert Henning; Adam Seidner; Laura Punnett
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Labor unions: a public health institution.

Authors:  Beth Malinowski; Meredith Minkler; Laura Stock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Assessing the physical activity environment in Mexican healthcare settings.

Authors:  Karla I Galaviz; Rebecca E Lee; Kim Bergeron; Lucie Lévesque
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

4.  A midpoint process evaluation of the Los Angeles Basin Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the US (REACH US) Disparities Center, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Antronette K Yancey; Mona AuYoung; Joyce J Guinyard; Beth A Glenn; Ritesh Mistry; William J McCarthy; Jonathan E Fielding; Paul A Simon; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Worksite characteristics and environmental and policy supports for cardiovascular disease prevention in New York state.

Authors:  Ian Brissette; Brian Fisher; Deborah A Spicer; Lori King
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.