I Janssen1, R Ross. 1. School of Physical and Health Education, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of sex on whole body and regional subcutaneous, visceral, total adipose tissue (AT), skeletal muscle (SM), and lean tissue in response to weight loss induced by diet alone (DO) or the combination of diet and aerobic (DA) or resistance exercise (DR). DESIGN:Sixty upper-body obese men and women were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: DO, DA, or DR. All tissues were measured using a whole body, magnetic resonance imaging protocol. RESULTS: Within each group reductions were observed for body weight ( approximately 11 kg), subcutaneous and visceral AT (P<0.01). After controlling for pretreatment differences in tissue size, reductions in total adiposity, total and regional subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue were not different between sexes (P>0.1). Independent of sex, the reduction in visceral AT was greater than subcutaneous AT (P<0.05) in response to DO and DA. With the exception of DA women, the reduction in abdominal subcutaneous AT was greater (P<0.05) than lower-body subcutaneous AT in response to diet and exercise, but not diet alone, in both sexes (P>0.05). Independent of sex, skeletal muscle mass was preserved within the exercise groups (P>0.05) but not diet alone (P<0.05). Peak VO2 (l/min) improved in the DA groups as did muscular strength in the DR groups (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that in response to diet or diet and exercise-induced weight loss, reductions in total adiposity, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue distribution are not different in obese men and women. Independent of sex, the combination of diet and exercise results in a preservation of skeletal muscle mass, a preferential reduction of abdominal subcutaneous AT, and improved functional capacity by comparison to diet alone.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of sex on whole body and regional subcutaneous, visceral, total adipose tissue (AT), skeletal muscle (SM), and lean tissue in response to weight loss induced by diet alone (DO) or the combination of diet and aerobic (DA) or resistance exercise (DR). DESIGN: Sixty upper-body obesemen and women were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: DO, DA, or DR. All tissues were measured using a whole body, magnetic resonance imaging protocol. RESULTS: Within each group reductions were observed for body weight ( approximately 11 kg), subcutaneous and visceral AT (P<0.01). After controlling for pretreatment differences in tissue size, reductions in total adiposity, total and regional subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue were not different between sexes (P>0.1). Independent of sex, the reduction in visceral AT was greater than subcutaneous AT (P<0.05) in response to DO and DA. With the exception of DAwomen, the reduction in abdominal subcutaneous AT was greater (P<0.05) than lower-body subcutaneous AT in response to diet and exercise, but not diet alone, in both sexes (P>0.05). Independent of sex, skeletal muscle mass was preserved within the exercise groups (P>0.05) but not diet alone (P<0.05). Peak VO2 (l/min) improved in the DA groups as did muscular strength in the DR groups (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that in response to diet or diet and exercise-induced weight loss, reductions in total adiposity, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue distribution are not different in obesemen and women. Independent of sex, the combination of diet and exercise results in a preservation of skeletal muscle mass, a preferential reduction of abdominal subcutaneous AT, and improved functional capacity by comparison to diet alone.
Authors: Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Haiying Tang; Stanley Heshka; Mark Punyanitya; Shankuan Zhu; Jianbo Lei; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Obes Res Date: 2003-02
Authors: Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Mark Punyanita; Jianbo Lei; Ahmet Sinav; John G Kral; Celina Imielinska; Robert Ross; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Obes Res Date: 2003-01
Authors: Valerie B O'Leary; Christine M Marchetti; Raj K Krishnan; Bradley P Stetzer; Frank Gonzalez; John P Kirwan Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-12-22
Authors: S Bonekamp; P Ghosh; S Crawford; S F Solga; A Horska; F L Brancati; A M Diehl; S Smith; J M Clark Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Amanda N Szabo; Kate Lambourne; Erik A Willis; Lauren T Ptomey; Jeffery J Honas; Stephen D Herrmann; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Edward P Weiss; Richard C Jordan; Ethel M Frese; Stewart G Albert; Dennis T Villareal Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411