Literature DB >> 10556306

Relative stabilities of dinucleotide and tetranucleotide repeats in cultured mammalian cells.

J S Lee1, M G Hanford, J L Genova, R A Farber.   

Abstract

The differences in rates of frameshift mutations between a dinucleotide repeat sequence [(CA)(17)] and a tetranucleotide repeat sequence [(GAAA)(17)] have been determined in immortalized, non-tumorigenic, mismatch repair-proficient mouse cells and in mismatch repair-defective human colorectal cancer cells. Clones with mutations were selected on the basis of restoration of activity of a bacterial neomycin resistance gene whose reading frame was disrupted by insertion of the microsatellite upstream of the translation initiation codon. This gene was introduced into the cells on a plasmid, which integrated into the genome of the host cells. Mutation rates of the tetra-nucleotide repeat were much lower than those of the dinucleotide repeat in both cell types. In addition, independent subclones of the colorectal cancer cell line were assayed by PCR for instability of endo-gen-ous tetranucleotide and dinucleotide repeat sequen-ces. In all cases, the mutation frequencies of the dinucleotide repeats were higher than those of the tetranucleotide repeats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10556306     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/8.13.2567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  11 in total

1.  Mechanistic features of CAG*CTG repeat contractions in cultured cells revealed by a novel genetic assay.

Authors:  Richard Pelletier; Brian T Farrell; Juan José Miret; Robert S Lahue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Merritt; Theresa M Culley; Alina Avanesyan; Richard Stokes; Jessica Brzyski
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Mouse cell line authentication.

Authors:  Jamie L Almeida; Carolyn R Hill; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci from Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B.

Authors:  M Hadjistylli; S A Schwartz; J K Brown; G K Roderick
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  PeakSeeker: a program for interpreting genotypes of mononucleotide repeats.

Authors:  James M Thompson; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-02-03

6.  Distribution of polymorphic and non-polymorphic microsatellite repeats in Xenopus tropicalis.

Authors:  Zhenkang Xu; Laura Gutierrez; Matthew Hitchens; Steve Scherer; Amy K Sater; Dan E Wells
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-02-26

7.  Sequence determinants of human microsatellite variability.

Authors:  Trevor J Pemberton; Conner I Sandefur; Mattias Jakobsson; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Comparisons of mutation rate variation at genome-wide microsatellites: evolutionary insights from two cultivated rice and their wild relatives.

Authors:  Li-Zhi Gao; Hongyan Xu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 9.  Non-LTR retrotransposons and microsatellites: Partners in genomic variation.

Authors:  Fiorella C Grandi; Wenfeng An
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2013-07-11

Review 10.  A brief review of short tandem repeat mutation.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Jia-You Chu
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.