Literature DB >> 10554849

Midterm results after the Mini-Maze procedure.

Z A Szalay1, W Skwara, H F Pitschner, I Faude, W P Klövekorn, E P Bauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. However, its precise electrophysiologic mechanism is still not well understood. Chronic symptomatic AF resistant to medical therapy, can successfully be treated by the Maze III procedure (M III). However, there are several publications dealing with alternative surgical techniques. This study describes technique and midterm results of a Mini-variant of the M III procedure.
METHODS: During a 38-month period we performed either an M III (seven patients) (group I) or a MINI-operation (45 patients) (group II) with chronic symptomatic AF and additional cardiac pathology. Patients were controlled 3.6 +/- 0.9 and 14.9 +/- 2.2 months after operation by means of thorough electrophysiological assessment, right heart catheterization, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), echocardiography, stress-EGG and 24-h-ECG.
RESULTS: There was no significant differences between the two groups with regard to sex, age and duration of AF. Echocardiographic left atrial diameter (LAD) was 75 +/- 11 mm in group I and 67 +/- 8 mm in group II (P = 0.01). Whereas right atrial diameter was 62 +/- 8 mm in group I and 56 +/- 7 mm in group II (NS). Perioperative data (n = 52): aortic cross clamp time was 127 +/- 40 mm in group I and 87 +/- 21 mm in group II, (P = 0.0002). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 185 +/- 71 mm in group I and 137 +/- 46 mm in group II, (P = 0.02). Postoperative data: there was no difference between the two groups with regard to sinus rhythm, prolonged sinus node recovery time, pacemaker (PM) in AAI-mode, inducible atrial fibrillation, reduction of left and right atrial size after a follow-up interval of 3.6 months and 1 year, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Midterm results are identical after M III and MINI. MINI is less complex compared to the M III procedure and there is a significant reduction of crossclamp- and ECC-time. We recommend the MINI especially for polymorbid patients, and for those with poor left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10554849     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00208-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Atrial Fibrillation - A Common Ground for Neurology and Cardiology.

Authors:  Fawzi Abukhalil; Aakash Bodhit; Peter Y Cai; Saeed Ansari; Spandana Thenkabail; Sarah Ganji; Pradeepan Saravanapavan; Chandana Chandra Shekhar; Michael F Waters; Thomas M Beaver; Vishnumurthy Shushrutha Hedna
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

2.  Epicardial microwave application in chronic atrial fibrillation surgery.

Authors:  Sang Kwon Lee; Suk Jung Choo; Kyung Sun Kim; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Energy Sources.

Authors:  Alexandre Visconti Brick; Domingo Marcolino Braile
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

4.  Trends in the management of atrial fibrillation: A neurologist's perspective.

Authors:  Vishnumurthy Shushrutha Hedna; Christopher G Favilla; Waldo R Guerrero; Akhil Patel; Amareshwari Gottipati; Sharathchandra Bidari; Thomas Beaver; Michael F Waters
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2012-10

5.  Atrial extracellular matrix remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  V Polyakova; S Miyagawa; Z Szalay; J Risteli; S Kostin
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Extra-pericardial tamponade following Wolf Mini-Maze procedure: a case report.

Authors:  James P Bailey
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.