Literature DB >> 10554584

The effects of threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification.

C J Aitken1, D A Siddle, O V Lipp.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of visually presented threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification among unselected young adults (Experiment 1, N = 35) and participants selected for low and high trait anxiety (Experiment 2, N = 60). The blink reflex was elicited by a white noise probe of 105 dB. Lead stimulus intervals of 60, 120, 240, and 2000 ms were used in both experiments. Prepulse inhibition was observed at the 240-ms interval and prepulse facilitation was observed at the 60-ms interval in both experiments. Also, greater facilitation was found in both experiments during threat words at the 60-ms interval and greater inhibition during threat words at the 240-ms interval. Experiment 2 provided some evidence that the greater facilitation during threat words than during nonthreat words at the 60-ms probe interval may be found in high trait anxious participants, but not in low trait anxious participants. The results are discussed in relation to contemporary information processing theories of anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10554584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Individuals with autism spectrum disorder show normal responses to a fear potential startle paradigm.

Authors:  Raphael Bernier; Geraldine Dawson; Heracles Panagiotides; Sara Webb
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2005-10

2.  Trait anxiety modulates supraliminal and subliminal threat: brain potential evidence for early and late processing influences.

Authors:  Wen Li; Richard E Zinbarg; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Sex-related differences in prepulse inhibition of startle in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Authors:  L A Kilpatrick; E Ornitz; H Ibrahimovic; M Treanor; M Craske; M Nazarian; J S Labus; E A Mayer; B D Naliboff
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Negation as a means for emotion regulation? Startle reflex modulation during processing of negated emotional words.

Authors:  Cornelia Herbert; Roland Deutsch; Stefan Sütterlin; Andrea Kübler; Paul Pauli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Lack of startle modulation by smoking cues in smokers.

Authors:  S Orain-Pelissolo; C Grillon; F Perez-Diaz; R Jouvent
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.