BACKGROUND: The overall mortality due to metastatic cancer has not or only minimally been reduced in spite of intensive research and many innovations in the field of conventional antineoplastic therapy in the past decade. In the last years it has become a fact that tumor growth is angiogenesis-dependent. Therefore, inhibitors of angiogenesis are a new class of antineoplastic substances with a novel mechanism of action that might be a powerful complement to conventional cytostatic therapy. SUBSTANCES AND CLINICAL TRIALS: Inhibitors of tumor-angiogenesis which have entered clinical trials, with their results published until December 1998 are discussed here. Most results originate from phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. They are discussed and compared in respect to toxicity and response. Also some substances with high therapeutic potential which are still in preclinical testing are discussed. RESULTS: Many of the investigated angiogenesis inhibitors demonstrated anti-tumor effects in phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. The commonest manifestation was stable disease, followed by partial remissions. In a few cases, complete remissions were observed. The toxicities of these substances differ both in type and degree of side effects. CONCLUSION: Some antiangiogenic drugs appear to be promising candidates for a clinical use in the therapy of solid tumors. Further conclusions can only be drawn after evaluation of the results of ongoing phase-III clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: The overall mortality due to metastatic cancer has not or only minimally been reduced in spite of intensive research and many innovations in the field of conventional antineoplastic therapy in the past decade. In the last years it has become a fact that tumor growth is angiogenesis-dependent. Therefore, inhibitors of angiogenesis are a new class of antineoplastic substances with a novel mechanism of action that might be a powerful complement to conventional cytostatic therapy. SUBSTANCES AND CLINICAL TRIALS: Inhibitors of tumor-angiogenesis which have entered clinical trials, with their results published until December 1998 are discussed here. Most results originate from phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. They are discussed and compared in respect to toxicity and response. Also some substances with high therapeutic potential which are still in preclinical testing are discussed. RESULTS: Many of the investigated angiogenesis inhibitors demonstrated anti-tumor effects in phase-I or phase-II clinical trials. The commonest manifestation was stable disease, followed by partial remissions. In a few cases, complete remissions were observed. The toxicities of these substances differ both in type and degree of side effects. CONCLUSION: Some antiangiogenic drugs appear to be promising candidates for a clinical use in the therapy of solid tumors. Further conclusions can only be drawn after evaluation of the results of ongoing phase-III clinical trials.
Authors: M S O'Reilly; T Boehm; Y Shing; N Fukai; G Vasios; W S Lane; E Flynn; J R Birkhead; B R Olsen; J Folkman Journal: Cell Date: 1997-01-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: A P Kudelka; T Levy; C F Verschraegen; C L Edwards; S Piamsomboon; W Termrungruanglert; R S Freedman; A L Kaplan; D G Kieback; C A Meyers; K A Jaeckle; E Loyer; M Steger; R Mante; G Mavligit; A Killian; R A Tang; J U Gutterman; J J Kavanagh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 12.531