BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, cell separation technology has become an important tool in various fields of cell biology allowing for the analysis or subsequent cultivation of specific cell subsets. The objective of the present study was to evaluate if the established sorting techniques fluorescence-activated (FACS) and magnetic cell separation (MACS) affect cell membrane physiology in order to define the most non-perturbing application for the separation of tumor and stromal cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Membrane physiology was monitored in single cell suspensions of adherently grown BT474 breast tumor cells and N1 normal skin fibroblasts using flow cytometry. Cell membrane integrity was evaluated by propidium iodide (PI) staining. Microviscosity within the lipophilic membrane layer was determined by a monomer/excimer method utilizing pyrene decanoic acid, membrane potential measurements were carried out using the fluorescence indicator DiBAC4(3), and Annexin-V-staining reflected transversal membrane asymmetry, and an altered phospholipid distribution. RESULTS: Not only the number of preparative cycles prior to cell separation but also the sort conditions during FACS resulted in loss of membrane integrity of a certain cell fraction. If these PI-positive cells were excluded from further analysis, neither MACS nor FACS affected membrane microviscosity while a clear hyperpolarization in both cell types after MACS resulting from exposure to the ferromagnetic matrix of the depletion column and the inhomogeneous magnetic field was shown. In addition, cell sorting of BT474 tumor cells by MACS and FACS was accompanied by the generation of an Annexin-V-positive/PI-negative cell fraction with altered phospholipid distribution. Data were discussed with regard to the sort-induced "stress" conditions such as exposure to hydrodynamic forces or magnetic fields. CONCLUSIONS: Both separation procedures modify cell membrane with neither technique being physiologically preferable for subsequent analysis or recultivation of the sorted cells.
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, cell separation technology has become an important tool in various fields of cell biology allowing for the analysis or subsequent cultivation of specific cell subsets. The objective of the present study was to evaluate if the established sorting techniques fluorescence-activated (FACS) and magnetic cell separation (MACS) affect cell membrane physiology in order to define the most non-perturbing application for the separation of tumor and stromal cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Membrane physiology was monitored in single cell suspensions of adherently grown BT474 breast tumor cells and N1 normal skin fibroblasts using flow cytometry. Cell membrane integrity was evaluated by propidium iodide (PI) staining. Microviscosity within the lipophilic membrane layer was determined by a monomer/excimer method utilizing pyrene decanoic acid, membrane potential measurements were carried out using the fluorescence indicator DiBAC4(3), and Annexin-V-staining reflected transversal membrane asymmetry, and an altered phospholipid distribution. RESULTS: Not only the number of preparative cycles prior to cell separation but also the sort conditions during FACS resulted in loss of membrane integrity of a certain cell fraction. If these PI-positive cells were excluded from further analysis, neither MACS nor FACS affected membrane microviscosity while a clear hyperpolarization in both cell types after MACS resulting from exposure to the ferromagnetic matrix of the depletion column and the inhomogeneous magnetic field was shown. In addition, cell sorting of BT474 tumor cells by MACS and FACS was accompanied by the generation of an Annexin-V-positive/PI-negative cell fraction with altered phospholipid distribution. Data were discussed with regard to the sort-induced "stress" conditions such as exposure to hydrodynamic forces or magnetic fields. CONCLUSIONS: Both separation procedures modify cell membrane with neither technique being physiologically preferable for subsequent analysis or recultivation of the sorted cells.
Authors: Huan Ma; Wael Mismar; Yuli Wang; Donald W Small; Mat Ras; Nancy L Allbritton; Christopher E Sims; Vasan Venugopalan Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Georgina To'a Salazar; Yuli Wang; Christopher E Sims; Mark Bachman; G P Li; Nancy L Allbritton Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.170