Literature DB >> 10554056

Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.

M Bruze1, L Condé-Salazar, A Goossens, L Kanerva, I R White.   

Abstract

Patch testing is the predominant method of establishing contact allergy. The present patch test technique is the result of a continuous process of development and improvement since its first application in the late 19th century. The perfect patch test should give no false-positive and no false-negative reactions. The ideal patch test should also cause as few adverse reactions as possible, particularly no patch test sensitization. Even though the history and examination of a patient with suspected allergic contact dermatitis will give clues to possible sensitizers, it is not sufficient to patch test only with initially suspected sensitizers; unsuspected sensitizers used for patch testing frequently turn out to be the real cause of the dermatitis. Fortunately, a small number of substances are considered to account for the majority of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Therefore, generally 20-25 test preparations consisting of chemically defined compounds, mixes of allergens, and natural and synthetic compounds, are grouped into a standard test series. The requirements to be fulfilled by a sensitizer in a standard patch test series are discussed in this article. A procedure of investigations is proposed before a sensitizer is included in a standard series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10554056     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  10 in total

1.  [Patch testing with the DKG standard series 2001-2004. Results from the IVDK].

Authors:  M Worm; J Brasch; J Geier; W Uter; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  A rare allergy to a polyether dental impression material.

Authors:  Pauline Mittermüller; Rolf-Markus Szeimies; Michael Landthaler; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Risk of contact allergy and dermatitis at a wind turbine plant using epoxy resin-based plastics.

Authors:  K Rasmussen; O Carstensen; A Pontén; B Gruvberger; M Isaksson; M Bruze
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Contact allergies to potential allergens in patients with oral lichen lesions.

Authors:  Camilla Ahlgren; Tony Axéll; Halvor Möller; Marléne Isaksson; Rolf Liedholm; Magnus Bruze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  [Epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergens. The "monitoring series" of IVDK (Information Network ofDermatologic Clinics for Detection and Scientific Evaluation of Contact Allergy].

Authors:  W Aberer; P Komericki; W Uter; B M Hausen; H Lessmann; B Kränke; J Geier; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  [Most important contact allergens in hand eczema].

Authors:  V Mahler; H Dickel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Contact Allergy to Oxidized Linalool and Oxidized Limonene is Over-represented in Individuals with Photocontact Allergy to Ketoprofen.

Authors:  Magnus Bruze; Victoria Marmgren; Annarita Antelmi; Monica Hindsén Stenström; Cecilia Svedman; Erik Zimersson; Martin Mowitz
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 8.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.

Authors:  Sepanta Hosseinpour; Alexis Gaudin; Ove A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes: An update from southern Sweden.

Authors:  Thanisorn Sukakul; Magnus Bruze; Martin Mowitz; Annarita Antelmi; Waranya Boonchai; Jakob Dahlin; Nils Hamnerius; Inese Hauksson; Tina Lejding; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.419

10.  A patient allergic to multiple chemically unrelated dyes.

Authors:  Tirza Blom; Edith M de Boer; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.