Literature DB >> 10553858

The performance of electroencephalogram bispectral index and auditory evoked potential index to predict loss of consciousness during propofol infusion.

S Schraag1, U Bothner, R Gajraj, G N Kenny, M Georgieff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The bispectral index (BIS) of the electroencephalogram and middle latency auditory evoked potentials are likely candidates to measure the level of unconsciousness and, thus, may improve the early recovery profile. We prospectively investigated the predictive performance of both measures to distinguish between the conscious and unconscious state. Twelve patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery during regional anesthesia additionally received propofol by target-controlled infusion for sedation. The electroencephalogram BIS and the auditory evoked potential index (AEPi), a mathematical derivative of the morphology of the auditory evoked potential waveform, were recorded simultaneously in all patients during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Logistic regression procedures, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were used to compare predictive ability of both indices. In the logistic regression models, both the BIS and AEPi were significant predictors of unconsciousness (P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for discrete descending index threshold values was apparently, but not significantly (P > 0.05), larger for the AEPi (0.968) than for the BIS (0.922), indicating a trend of better discriminatory performance. We conclude that both the BIS and AEPi are reliable means for monitoring the level of unconsciousness during propofol infusion. However, AEPi proved to offer more discriminatory power in the individual patient. IMPLICATIONS: Both the bispectral index of the electroencephalogram and the auditory evoked potentials index are good predictors of the level of sedation and unconsciousness during propofol infusion. However, the auditory evoked potentials index offers better discriminatory power in describing the transition from the conscious to the unconscious state in the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10553858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Bayesian probabilistic network modeling of remifentanil and propofol interaction on wakeup time after closed-loop controlled anesthesia.

Authors:  Ulrich Bothtner; Stewart E Milne; Gavin N C Kenny; Michael Georgieff; Stefan Schraag
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Auditory evoked potential index does not correlate with observer assessment of alertness and sedation score during 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with nitrous oxide sedation alone.

Authors:  Junko Ichikawa; Kumiko Taira; Keiko Nishiyama; Masato Endo; Mitsuharu Kodaka; Miwako Kawamata; Makiko Komori; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bart-Jan Lichtenbelt; Martijn Mertens; Jaap Vuyk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Comparison of propofol based anaesthesia to conventional inhalational general anaesthesia for spine surgery.

Authors:  Ld Mishra; Sk Pradhan; Cs Pradhan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Modeling of recovery profiles in mentally disabled and intact patients after sevoflurane anesthesia; a pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Teo Jeon Shin; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Yong-Seo Koo; Dong Woo Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  Awareness and recall during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.