Literature DB >> 10552835

Compositional analysis of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans treated with glyphosate.

N B Taylor1, R L Fuchs, J MacDonald, A R Shariff, S R Padgette.   

Abstract

The compositional analyses and safety assessment of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans (GTS) were previously described. These analyses were extensive and included addressing the potential effects on seed composition from the genetic modification. Detailed compositional analyses established that GTS, which had not been treated with glyphosate, were comparable to the parental soybean line and to other conventional soybeans. In this study, two GTS lines, 40-3-2 and 61-67-1, were treated with commercial levels of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup herbicide. The composition of the seed from soybeans sprayed with glyphosate was compared to that of a nonsprayed parental control cultivar, A5403. The nutrients measured in the seed included protein, oil, ash, fiber, carbohydrates, and amino acids. The concentration of isoflavones (also referred to as phytoestrogens) was also measured as these compounds are derived from the same biochemical pathway that was engineered for glyphosate tolerance. The analytical results from these studies demonstrate that the GTS soybeans treated with glyphosate were comparable to the parental soybean cultivar, A5403, and other conventional soybean varieties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10552835     DOI: 10.1021/jf990056g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  7 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of nutritional compositions between transgenic rice harboring the CaMsrB2 gene and the conventional counterpart.

Authors:  Yong-Hwa Cho; Pradeep Puligundla; Sung-Dug Oh; Hyang-Mi Park; Kyung-Min Kim; Si-Myung Lee; Tae-Hun Ryu; Young-Tack Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 2.  Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns-a review.

Authors:  A S Bawa; K R Anilakumar
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Mycorrhizal and rhizobial colonization of genetically modified and conventional soybeans.

Authors:  Jeff R Powell; Robert H Gulden; Miranda M Hart; Rachel G Campbell; David J Levy-Booth; Kari E Dunfield; K Peter Pauls; Clarence J Swanton; Jack T Trevors; John N Klironomos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Insect-protected event DAS-81419-2 soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in the United States and Brazil is compositionally equivalent to nontransgenic soybean.

Authors:  Brandon J Fast; Ariane C Schafer; Tempest Y Johnson; Brian L Potts; Rod A Herman
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Risk assessment of a new bioinformatics evaluation of the insertion sites of genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Tilemachos Goumperis; Tommaso Raffaello
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Safe composition levels of transgenic crops assessed via a clinical medicine model.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Peter N Scherer; Amy M Phillips; Nicholas P Storer; Mark Krieger
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Genetically modified foods and social concerns.

Authors:  Behrokh Mohajer Maghari; Ali M Ardekani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.