Literature DB >> 10551604

French survey of anesthesia in 1996.

F Clergue1, Y Auroy, F Péquignot, E Jougla, A Lienhart, M C Laxenaire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify the growth in the number of anesthetic procedures since 1980 and the changes in the practice of anesthesia, the present survey was designed to collect and analyze the anesthetic activity performed in France in 1996, from a representative sample collected in all French hospitals and clinics.
METHODS: This study, initiated by the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, collected information that included the characteristics of patients (age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status), the techniques of anesthesia, and the nature of the procedure for which anesthesia was required. All French private, public, and military hospitals were asked to participate in the survey. In each hospital in the country, all anesthetic procedures were documented and collected during 3 consecutive days, chosen at random during a 12-month period, to obtain a representative sample of the annual activity. All data were analyzed at the INSERM (National Institute of Health and MEDICAL RESEARCH: At the conclusion of the study, 5% of hospitals were randomly assigned to be audited to check for missing data and errors. The rate of anesthetic activity was calculated as the ratio between the annual number of anesthetic procedures and the number of the general population in the same age group.
RESULTS: The participation rate of hospitals was 98%. The analysis of the 62,415 collected questionnaires allowed extrapolation of the anesthetic activity to 7,937,000 anesthetic procedures (95% confidence interval, +/- 387,000) performed in France in 1996. Thus, the annual rate of anesthetic procedures was 13.5 per 100 population, varying between 5.4 per 100 in girls aged 5-14 yr and 30.2 per 100 in men aged 75-84 yr. Surgery was involved in 71% of anesthesia cases. Regional anesthesia alone was performed in 20% of all surgical cases and was combined with general anesthesia in 3% of additional cases. Anesthesia for obstetric procedures represented 9% of all cases. Seventy-six percent of all anesthetic procedures started between 12:00 A.M. and 7:00 A.M. were related to obstetric activities.
CONCLUSION: In comparison with a previous study, the present survey shows that the number of anesthetic procedures has increased by 120% since 1980, and the rate of anesthetic procedures increased from 6.6 to 13.5 per 100 population, the major changes being observed in patients aged > or = 75 yr and in those with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3. In the same time period, the number of regional anesthetic procedures increased 14-fold. In obstetrics, the practice of epidural analgesia extended from 1.5% to 51% of all deliveries of the country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10551604     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  22 in total

1.  Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

Review 2.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade.

Authors:  Richard Brull; Anahi Perlas; Vincent W S Chan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-02

3.  Transcutaneous nicotine does not prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Czarnetzki; Eduardo Schiffer; Christopher Lysakowski; Guy Haller; Daniel Bertrand; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Age-adapted morphine titration produces equivalent analgesia and adverse effects in younger and older patients.

Authors:  H Keïta; F Tubach; J Maalouli; J-M Desmonts; J Mantz
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Isoflurane induces hippocampal cell injury and cognitive impairments in adult rats.

Authors:  Daowei Lin; Zhiyi Zuo
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 6.  [Perioperative fluid management: an analysis of the present situation].

Authors:  Y A Zausig; M A Weigand; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Lidocaine attenuates cognitive impairment after isoflurane anesthesia in old rats.

Authors:  Daowei Lin; Lin Cao; Zhi Wang; Jiejie Li; Jacqueline M Washington; Zhiyi Zuo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Impact of remifentanil introduction on practice patterns in general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kanji Uchida; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroaki Miyata; Masahiko Sumitani; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Ken Kuwajima; Shinya Matsuda; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Adverse drug reactions to local anaesthetics: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database.

Authors:  Régis Fuzier; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Kamran Samii; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Mortality in anesthesia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leandro Gobbo Braz; Danilo Gobbo Braz; Deyvid Santos da Cruz; Luciano Augusto Fernandes; Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo; José Reinaldo Cerqueira Braz
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.