BACKGROUND: Current methods for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection related to central venous catheters (CVC) are slow and in many cases require catheter removal. Since most CVC that are removed on suspicion of causing infection prove not to be infected, removal of catheters unnecessarily exposes patients to the risks associated with reinsertion. METHODS: The gram stain and acridine-orange leucocyte cytospin test (AOLC) is rapid (30 min), inexpensive, and requires only 100 microL catheter blood (treated with edetic acid) and the use of light and ultraviolet microscopy. We assessed the gram stain and AOLC test in suspected cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection, in comparison with two methods requiring catheter removal (tip roll and tip flush), and a third technique, done in situ (endoluminal brush) in conjunction with quantitative peripheral-blood cultures. FINDINGS: 128 cases of suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection were assessed in 124 adult surgical patients (median duration of CVC placement was 16 days). In 112 (88%) cases CVC blood was obtainable. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 50 cases (culture of the same organism from the catheter, in significant numbers, and from peripheral-blood culture). The sensitivity of the gram stain and AOLC test was 96% and the specificity was 92%, with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 97%. By comparison, the tip-roll, tip-flush, and endoluminal-brush methods had sensitivities of 90%, 95%, and 92%, and specificities of 55%, 76%, and 98%, respectively. INTERPRETATION: The gram stain and AOLC test is a simple, and rapid method for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. This diagnostic method compares favourably with other diagnostic methods, particularly those that require the removal of the catheter, and can permit early targeted antimicrobial therapy.
BACKGROUND: Current methods for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection related to central venous catheters (CVC) are slow and in many cases require catheter removal. Since most CVC that are removed on suspicion of causing infection prove not to be infected, removal of catheters unnecessarily exposes patients to the risks associated with reinsertion. METHODS: The gram stain and acridine-orange leucocyte cytospin test (AOLC) is rapid (30 min), inexpensive, and requires only 100 microL catheter blood (treated with edetic acid) and the use of light and ultraviolet microscopy. We assessed the gram stain and AOLC test in suspected cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection, in comparison with two methods requiring catheter removal (tip roll and tip flush), and a third technique, done in situ (endoluminal brush) in conjunction with quantitative peripheral-blood cultures. FINDINGS: 128 cases of suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection were assessed in 124 adult surgical patients (median duration of CVC placement was 16 days). In 112 (88%) cases CVC blood was obtainable. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 50 cases (culture of the same organism from the catheter, in significant numbers, and from peripheral-blood culture). The sensitivity of the gram stain and AOLC test was 96% and the specificity was 92%, with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 97%. By comparison, the tip-roll, tip-flush, and endoluminal-brush methods had sensitivities of 90%, 95%, and 92%, and specificities of 55%, 76%, and 98%, respectively. INTERPRETATION: The gram stain and AOLC test is a simple, and rapid method for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. This diagnostic method compares favourably with other diagnostic methods, particularly those that require the removal of the catheter, and can permit early targeted antimicrobial therapy.
Authors: P C Wever; E R Heddema; M G A van Vonderen; J T M van der Meer; M D de Jong; T van Gool Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: R Krause; H W Auner; G Gorkiewicz; A Wölfler; F Daxboeck; W Linkesch; G J Krejs; C Wenisch; E C Reisinger Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: M Guembe; P Martín-Rabadán; A Echenagusia; F Camúñez; G Rodríguez-Rosales; G Simó; M Echenagusia; E Bouza Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 5.948