PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that (a) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided radio-frequency (RF) thermal ablation in the pancreas is safe and feasible in a porcine model and (b) induced thermal lesion size can be predicted with MR imaging monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging-guided RF ablation was performed in the pancreas of six pigs. A 17-gauge monopolar RF probe was inserted into the pancreas with MR imaging guidance, and RF was applied for 10 minutes. After postprocedural imaging (T2-weighted, short inversion time inversion-recovery [STIR], and T1-weighted imaging before and after intravenous administration of gadodiamide), the pigs were observed for 7 days and follow-up MR images were acquired. The pigs were sacrificed, and pathologic examination was performed. RESULTS: Successful RF probe placement was accomplished in all pigs; the interventional procedure took 46-80 minutes. Thermal lesions were 12-15 mm perpendicular to the probe track and were best seen on STIR and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted images with a radiologic and/or pathologic mean difference in RF lesion diameter of 1.7 mm +/- 1.0 (SD) and 0.8 mm +/- 1.2, respectively. Diarrhea was the only side effect during the 1-week follow-up; no clinical signs of pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided RF thermal ablation in the pancreas is feasible and safe. Induced thermal lesion size can best be monitored with STIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. In the future, RF ablation may offer an alternative treatment option for pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that (a) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided radio-frequency (RF) thermal ablation in the pancreas is safe and feasible in a porcine model and (b) induced thermal lesion size can be predicted with MR imaging monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging-guided RF ablation was performed in the pancreas of six pigs. A 17-gauge monopolar RF probe was inserted into the pancreas with MR imaging guidance, and RF was applied for 10 minutes. After postprocedural imaging (T2-weighted, short inversion time inversion-recovery [STIR], and T1-weighted imaging before and after intravenous administration of gadodiamide), the pigs were observed for 7 days and follow-up MR images were acquired. The pigs were sacrificed, and pathologic examination was performed. RESULTS: Successful RF probe placement was accomplished in all pigs; the interventional procedure took 46-80 minutes. Thermal lesions were 12-15 mm perpendicular to the probe track and were best seen on STIR and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted images with a radiologic and/or pathologic mean difference in RF lesion diameter of 1.7 mm +/- 1.0 (SD) and 0.8 mm +/- 1.2, respectively. Diarrhea was the only side effect during the 1-week follow-up; no clinical signs of pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided RF thermal ablation in the pancreas is feasible and safe. Induced thermal lesion size can best be monitored with STIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. In the future, RF ablation may offer an alternative treatment option for pancreatic cancer.
Authors: C P Morrison; F G Court; S A Wemyss-Holden; B D Teague; A Burrell; M Texler; M S Metcalfe; A R Dennison; G J Maddern Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-08-24 Impact factor: 4.584