Literature DB >> 10550841

3D treatment planning and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

J A Purdy1.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) image-based treatment planning and new delivery technologies have spurred the implementation of external beam radiation therapy techniques, in which the high-dose region is conformed much more closely to the target volume than previously possible, thus reducing the volume of normal tissues receiving a high dose. This form of external beam irradiation is referred to as 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). 3DCRT is not just an add-on to the current radiation oncology process; it represents a radical change in practice, particularly for the radiation oncologist. Defining target volumes and organs at risk in 3D by drawing contours on CT images on a slice-by-slice basis, as opposed to drawing beam portals on a simulator radiograph, can be challenging, because radiation oncologists are generally not well trained in cross-sectional imaging. Currently, the 3DCRT approach will increase the time and effort required by physicians inexperienced with 3D treatment planning. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a more advanced form of 3DCRT, but there is considerable developmental work remaining. The instrumentation and methods used for IMRT quality assurance procedures and testing are not well established. Computer optimization cost functions are too simplistic, and thus time-consuming. Subjective plan evaluation by the radiation oncologist is still the norm. In addition, many fundamental questions regarding IMRT remain unanswered. For example, the radiobiophysical consequences of altered time-dose-fraction are unknown. Also, the fact that there is much greater dose heterogeneity for both the target and normal critical structures with IMRT compared to traditional irradiation techniques challenges current radiation oncology planning principles. However, this new process of planning and treatment delivery shows significant potential for improving the therapeutic ratio. In addition, while inefficient today, these systems, when fully developed, will improve the efficiency with which external beam radiation therapy can be planned and delivered, thus lowering costs.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  7 in total

1.  Clinical research on alternating hyperfraction radiotherapy for massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhixiong Long; Bin Wang; Dan Tao; Yanping Liu; Jiangzhou Zhang; Jiaan Tan; Jing Luo; Feifei Shi; Zezhang Tao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Validation of the CT-MRI image registration with a dedicated phantom.

Authors:  Sofia Spampinato; Anna Maria Gueli; Luigi Raffaele; Concetta Stancampiano; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Optimizing tumor immune response through combination of radiation and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Alissar El Chediak; Ali Shamseddine; Larry Bodgi; Jean-Pierre Obeid; Fady Geara; Youssef H Zeidan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Paranasal sinus cancer: caveats and controversies.

Authors:  John Waldron; Ian Witterick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Adam D Melancon; Jennifer C O'Daniel; Lifei Zhang; Rajat J Kudchadker; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Rex M Cheung; Renaud de Crevoisier; Susan L Tucker; Wayne D Newhauser; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 6.  Evolving Clinical Cancer Radiotherapy: Concerns Regarding Normal Tissue Protection and Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Won Hoon Choi; Jaeho Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  A parameter optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiotherapy prostate treatment planning.

Authors:  J Barbiere; M F Chan; J Mechalakos; D Cann; K Schupak; C Burman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.