Literature DB >> 10550813

Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients.

R A Charter1.   

Abstract

Precision of the reliability coefficient (r) is investigated. The width of the confidence interval for r as a function of sample size (N) is shown for retest, alternate-form, split-half, alpha, intraclass, interrater, and validity coefficients. Although the determination of the N needed for reliability studies is somewhat subjective, a minimum of 400 subjects is recommended. Much larger Ns may be needed for validity studies. A survey of published reliability studies shows that 59% of the sample sizes were less than 100. Confidence intervals for obtained test scores are used as a practical application measure that also leads to the conclusion of a minimum of 400 subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550813     DOI: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.559.889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  28 in total

1.  Cancer-related worry in Canadian thyroid cancer survivors.

Authors:  Lauren Bresner; Rita Banach; Gary Rodin; Lehana Thabane; Shereen Ezzat; Anna M Sawka
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Methodologic Issues in Neuropsychological Testing.

Authors:  William B. Barr
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology?

Authors:  Jeremy C Hobart; Stefan J Cano; Thomas T Warner; Alan J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Test-retest and between-site reliability in a multicenter fMRI study.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Hal Stern; Gregory G Brown; Daniel H Mathalon; Jessica Turner; Gary H Glover; Randy L Gollub; John Lauriello; Kelvin O Lim; Tyrone Cannon; Douglas N Greve; Henry Jeremy Bockholt; Aysenil Belger; Bryon Mueller; Michael J Doty; Jianchun He; William Wells; Padhraic Smyth; Steve Pieper; Seyoung Kim; Marek Kubicki; Mark Vangel; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Using online components to facilitate program implementation: impact of technological enhancements to all stars on ease and quality of program delivery.

Authors:  William B Hansen; Dana C Bishop; Kelvin S Bryant
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2009-03

Review 6.  Observational tools for measuring parent-infant interaction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annett Lotzin; Xiaoxing Lu; Levente Kriston; Julia Schiborr; Teresa Musal; Georg Romer; Brigitte Ramsauer
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-06

Review 7.  Psychiatric diagnosis by telephone: is it an opportunity?

Authors:  Esther M H Muskens; Peter Lucassen; Wilke Groenleer; Chris van Weel; Richard Oude Voshaar; Anne Speckens
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  The Role of Attachment Anxiety and Attachment Avoidance on the Psychosocial Well-being of Infertile Couples.

Authors:  M Moura-Ramos; T Almeida Santos; M C Canavarro
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2017-06

9.  The Jena Voice Learning and Memory Test (JVLMT): A standardized tool for assessing the ability to learn and recognize voices.

Authors:  Denise Humble; Stefan R Schweinberger; Axel Mayer; Tim L Jesgarzewsky; Christian Dobel; Romi Zäske
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

10.  Dynamic Causal Modeling applied to fMRI data shows high reliability.

Authors:  Brianna Schuyler; John M Ollinger; Terrence R Oakes; Tom Johnstone; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.