Literature DB >> 10550502

Prepulse modulation of the startle reaction and the blink reflex in normal human subjects.

J Valls-Solé1, F Valldeoriola, J L Molinuevo, G Cossu, F Nobbe.   

Abstract

Blink reflexes are usually considered the most representative and consistent response of the auditory startle reaction (ASR), and they are often the only response evaluated in human psychophysiological studies. However, auditory stimuli also induce an auditory blink reflex (ABR), the physiological characteristics and brainstem circuitry of which may be different from those of the ASR. This study aimed to investigate whether there were differences between the orbicularis oculi (OOc) responses elicited with the ABR (OOcABR) and those elicited with the ASR (OOcASR) regarding their behavior to prepulse modulation. For comparison, we also examined the OOc responses to supraorbital nerve stimulation (OOcEBR). Electromyographic responses were simultaneously recorded from the OOc, masseter (MAS) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. ABRs were considered when auditory stimuli induced responses limited to the OOc, and ASRs were considered when responses were induced in all muscles recorded from. Prepulse stimuli were either a weak electrical stimulation at the third finger (somatosensory prepulse) or a weak acoustic tone (auditory prepulse) that preceded the response-eliciting stimuli by intervals ranging from 0 to 200 ms. Prepulse effects differed according to prepulse modality, but the OOcABR and the OOcASR were always modulated in the same way. In both responses, somatosensory prepulses induced facilitation from 20 to 50 ms, followed by inhibition beyond 75 ms, and auditory prepulses induced no facilitation but a significant inhibition beyond 30 ms. In the OOcEBR, both somatosensory and acoustic prepulses induced facilitation of R1 and inhibition of R2 beyond 30 ms. Our results suggest that the OOcABR and the OOcASR exhibit the same physiological behavior regarding prepulse modulation. It is hypothesized that prepulse facilitation is due to direct impingement of subthreshold excitatory inputs onto the facial motoneurons while prepulse inhibition results from the engagement of a presynaptic inhibitory circuit in the brainstem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550502     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  The startle reaction to somatosensory inputs: different response pattern to stimuli of upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Silvio Alvarez-Blanco; Lucia Leon; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Fear leads to a deficit of prepulse inhibition of blink reflex in healthy humans.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gündüz; Selen Koçak; Sedat Gez; Meral E Kızıltan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Sensorimotor integration in patients with parkinsonian type multisystem atrophy.

Authors:  M M Mascia; J Valls-Solé; M J Martí; G Salazar
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Reorganization of sensory input at brainstem in hemifacial spasm and postparalytic facial syndrome.

Authors:  Meral E Kızıltan; Ayşegul Gunduz
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Jendrassik maneuver effect on spinal and brainstem reflexes.

Authors:  Lale Aslihan Ertuglu; Asli Aydin; Hatice Kumru; Josep Valls-Sole; Eloy Opisso; Serpil Cecen; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Markus Kofler; Hatice Kumru; Juan Manuel Castellote; Maria Teresa Sanegre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Auditory and Lower Limb Tactile Prepulse Inhibition in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome: Clues to Its Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Fidias E Leon-Sarmiento; Elizabeth Peckham; Daniel S Leon-Ariza; William Bara-Jimenez; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  The effect of a prepulse stimulus on the EMG rebound following the cutaneous silent period.

Authors:  H Kumru; E Opisso; J Valls-Solé; M Kofler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Role of mesial temporal lobe structures in sensory processing in humans: a prepulse modulation study in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Meral E Kızıltan; Bengi Gül Alpaslan; Çiğdem Özkara; Mustafa Uzan; Ayşegül Gündüz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.