Literature DB >> 10549803

Induction of tolerance against traumatic brain injury by ischemic preconditioning.

M A Pérez-Pinzón1, O Alonso, S Kraydieh, W D Dietrich.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that a transient non-lethal ischemic insult lasting 2 min would protect against subsequent moderate traumatic brain injury. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three experimental groups, including sham ischemia procedures and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) followed 48 h later by moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) provoked by parasagittal fluid percussion injury (1.8-2.1 atm) and IPC followed by 48 h sham TBI. Seven days after the secondary insult, animals were perfusion-fixed for quantitative histopathological analysis. The CA3 necrotic cell count was decreased by 63% in TBI animals that had undergone IPC as compared to TBI animals that underwent sham IPC. TBI animals that had undergone IPC demonstrated significantly smaller contusion volumes than the TBI alone group (6.44 +/- 1.51 vs 1.37 +/- 0.63 mm3, mean +/- s.e.m.) These data indicate that IPC applied 2 days before moderate fluid percussion brain injury increases the brain resistance to traumatic brain damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10549803     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199909290-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  15 in total

1.  Is there a place for cerebral preconditioning in the clinic?

Authors:  Richard F Keep; Michael M Wang; Jianming Xiang; Ya Hua; Guohua Xi
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 6.829

2.  Long-lasting protection in brain trauma by endotoxin preconditioning.

Authors:  Luca Longhi; Raffaella Gesuete; Carlo Perego; Fabrizio Ortolano; Noemi Sacchi; Pia Villa; Nino Stocchetti; Maria-Grazia De Simoni
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Preconditioning for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Shoji Yokobori; Anna T Mazzeo; Khadil Hosein; Shyam Gajavelli; W Dalton Dietrich; M Ross Bullock
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  Should the STAIR criteria be modified for preconditioning studies?

Authors:  Michael M Wang; Guohua Xi; Richard F Keep
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Acute neuroprotection to pilocarpine-induced seizures is not sustained after traumatic brain injury in the developing rat.

Authors:  G G Gurkoff; C C Giza; D Shin; S Auvin; R Sankar; D A Hovda
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Epigenetic modulation of gene expression governs the brain's response to injury.

Authors:  Roger P Simon
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Ependyma as a possible morphological basis of ischemic preconditioning tolerance in rat spinal cord ischemia model: nestin and Fluoro-Jade B observations.

Authors:  Judita Orendácová; Enikö Raceková; Karolína Kuchárova; Barbora Pousová; Tomás Ondrejcák; Marcela Martoncíková; Zuzana Daxnerová; Jozef Marsala
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 8.  Steps to translate preconditioning from basic research to the clinic.

Authors:  Frances R Bahjat; Raffaella Gesuete; Mary P Stenzel-Poore
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 9.  Remote ischemic preconditioning as treatment for non-ischemic gastrointestinal disorders: beyond ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Carlos Rodrigo Camara-Lemarroy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Remote ischaemic conditioning-a new paradigm of self-protection in the brain.

Authors:  David C Hess; Rolf A Blauenfeldt; Grethe Andersen; Kristina D Hougaard; Md Nasrul Hoda; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.