Literature DB >> 10549647

Accommodation responses and ageing.

G Heron1, W N Charman, L S Gray.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the impact of age on accommodation dynamics.
METHODS: Monocular accommodation responses were measured continuously using a modified Canon Auto Ref R1 infrared optometer. The stimulus was a single letter oscillating sinusoidally between 2.38 and 1.33 D providing a stimulus amplitude of 0.52 D, about a mean level of 1.86 D. Response characteristics were used to quantify gain and phase. Step responses were also recorded between these stimulus vergence levels for calibration purposes and to measure reaction and response times. Nineteen visually normal subjects 18 to 49 years of age participated, and 11 frequencies were used in the range 0.05 to 1.0 Hz. A key feature of the experimental design was to use a stimulus vergence range that lay within the amplitude of accommodation of all the observers.
RESULTS: Accommodation gain reduced and phase lag increased with age, particularly at the higher frequencies used. No strongly significant change with age was found for reaction and response times or accommodation velocity, and results were similar for both far-to-near and near-to-far responses. Response amplitude for the step change in target vergence declined with age, and substantial differences were found between the measured and predicted (from reaction time) phase lags at 1.0 Hz as a function of age. Young observers showed a phase lag that was shorter than predicted, whereas older observers' measured phase lags were considerably larger than predicted.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show that for a target oscillating sinusoidally in a predictable manner at a modest amplitude, the main ageing effects occur in phase lag, which is appreciably longer than predicted from reaction times in the older observers. The effects of ageing on gain were not as marked. Although responses to small step changes do reduce with age, there is no evidence of increased response times with ageing. In general, accommodation function in the middle-aged eye is quite robust despite a dwindling amplitude of accommodation. These results provide evidence of accommodative vigor in youth and a slowing of accommodation with ageing.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10549647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Edinger--Westphal stimulated accommodative dynamics in anesthetized, middle-aged rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Martin Baumeister; Mark Wendt; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Adrian Glasser; Ruth E Manny; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses.

Authors:  Miriam Casares-López; José J Castro-Torres; Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Dynamic imaging of accommodation by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Alberto Neri; Marco Ruggeri; Alessandra Protti; Rosachiara Leaci; Stefano A Gandolfi; Claudio Macaluso
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Measurement of visual strain in radiologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Virtual slide telepathology workstation of the future: lessons learned from teleradiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Seeing the future: Predictive control in neural models of ocular accommodation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Christos Kaspiris-Rousellis; Toby S Wood; Bing Wu; Björn N S Vlaskamp; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Accommodative Response in Patients with Central Field Loss: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ali Mazyed Alsaqr; Hisham AlShareef; Faisal Alhajri; Ali Abusharha; Raied Fagehi; Ahmad Alharbi; Saud Alanazi
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.