Literature DB >> 10548397

Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment.

R Ballard-Barbash1, C Klabunde, E Paci, M Broeders, E A Coleman, J Fracheboud, F Bouchard, G Rennert, S Shapiro.   

Abstract

Following clinical trial evidence of mammography screening's efficacy and effectiveness, data are needed from organized population-based programmes to determine whether screening in these programmes results in breast cancer mortality reductions comparable to those demonstrated in controlled settings. The International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) conducted two international programme assessments: in 1990 among nine countries and in 1995 among 22 countries, obtaining information on the organization and process for screening within breast cancer screening programmes. This manuscript describes procedures for recruitment, service delivery, interpretation and communication of results, case ascertainment, and quality assurance. Practices in more established programmes are compared with pilot programmes. Each IBSN country defined a unique programme of population-based breast cancer screening. Some programmes were sub-national rather than national in scope, while others were in pilot stages of development. Screening took place in dedicated centres in established programmes and in both dedicated and general radiology centres in pilot programmes. Although most countries used personal invitation systems to recruit women to screening, other recruitment mechanisms were used. Most countries used two-view mammography in their screening programmes. About half had implemented independent double reading of mammograms, considering it a key component of high-quality mammography screening. In conclusion, diversity exists in the organization and delivery of screening mammography internationally. Quality assurance activities are a priority and are being evaluated in the IBSN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10548397     DOI: 10.1097/00008469-199910000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  17 in total

1.  Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Improving the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M J Borugian; L Kan; S R Harris; E J Rousseau; S E Thorne; J A Vestrup; C J Wright; A J Coldman; T G Hislop
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

3.  Epidemiological aspects of cancer screening in Germany.

Authors:  Nikolaus Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.

Authors:  C Klabunde; F Bouchard; S Taplin; A Scharpantgen; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter; Eric A Berns; Connie Nakano; Joseph Egger; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Carl J D'Orsi; William Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; C Bancej; V Goel; J Snider; R G McAuley; B Irvine; L Kan; D Mirsky; M J Sabine; R McGilly; J S Caines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tanir M Allweis; Naama Hermann; Rinat Berenstein-Molho; Michal Guindy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Communicating with women about mammography.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Jane Zapka; Solveig S-H Hofvind; Astrid Scharpantgen; Livia Giordano; Noriaki Ohuchi; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Pamela M Vacek; Joan Skelly; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Evaluating Population-Based Screening Mammography Programs Internationally.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Semin Breast Dis       Date:  2007-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.